AI Models · Paid vs Paid

Sonar Pro Paid vs Seed 1.6 Flash Paid

Sonar Pro vs Seed 1.6 Flash compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

Sonar ProPaidPerplexity
$3 /M input
$15 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window200K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Seed 1.6 FlashPaidByteDance Seed
$0.08 /M input
$0.3 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window262K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Choose Seed 1.6 Flash for the lower output price ($0.3/M vs $15/M). It also gives you the larger 262K context window.

Sonar Pro vs Seed 1.6 Flash specs

SpecSonar ProSeed 1.6 FlashWinner
MakerPerplexityByteDance Seed
TypeProprietaryProprietary
Context window200K tokens262K tokensSeed 1.6 Flash
Input price$3/M$0.08/MSeed 1.6 Flash
Output price$15/M$0.3/MSeed 1.6 Flash
Vision / multimodalYesYes= Tie
Tool / function callingNoYesSeed 1.6 Flash
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)
LicenseProprietaryProprietary

Price gap & when to choose each

50×cheaper per output token

Seed 1.6 Flash is ~50× cheaper than Sonar Pro on output tokens ($0.3 vs $15 per M tokens).

Choose Sonar Pro if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure
Choose Seed 1.6 Flash if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You need the longer 262K context window
  • You want the lower output price
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

CapabilitySonar ProSeed 1.6 Flash
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

Benchmarks: Sonar Pro vs Seed 1.6 Flash

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

Sonar Pro
Seed 1.6 Flash
Intelligence index
7.6
GPQA
57.8%
MMLU-Pro
75.5%
Humanity's Last Exam
6.6%
LiveCodeBench
27.5%
MATH-500
74.5%
AIME
29%
Speed
0 tok/s
Latency
0s

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How Sonar Pro and Seed 1.6 Flash score

🏆 Best value & openness: Seed 1.6 Flash (3.3 vs 2.6 / 5)
CriterionSonar ProSeed 1.6 Flash
Cost-efficiency3.05.0
Context window4.04.0
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality3.55.0

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

Sonar Pro Paid

Perplexity · Proprietary

Note: Sonar Pro pricing includes Perplexity search pricing. See [details here](https://docs.perplexity.ai/guides/pricing#detailed-pricing-breakdown-for-sonar-reasoning-pro-and-sonar-pro) For enterprises seeking more advanced capabilities, t

Seed 1.6 Flash Paid

ByteDance Seed · Proprietary

Seed 1.6 Flash is an ultra-fast multimodal deep thinking model by ByteDance Seed, supporting both text and visual understanding. It features a 256k context window and can generate outputs of...

Frequently asked questions

Sonar Pro vs Seed 1.6 Flash — which is cheaper?

Seed 1.6 Flash is cheaper on output ($0.3/M vs $15/M).

Which has the larger context window?

Seed 1.6 Flash offers the larger context window (262K tokens).

Sonar Pro vs Seed 1.6 Flash — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Seed 1.6 Flash for the lower output price ($0.3/M vs $15/M). It also gives you the larger 262K context window.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →