AI Models · Paid vs Paid

Sonar Pro Paid vs Saba Paid

Sonar Pro vs Saba compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

Sonar ProPaidPerplexity
$3 /M input
$15 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window200K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
SabaPaidMistral AI
$0.2 /M input
$0.6 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window33K tokens
MultimodalNo
Self-hostNo
Choose Saba for the lower output price ($0.6/M vs $15/M). Choose Sonar Pro if you need the larger 200K context window.

Sonar Pro vs Saba specs

SpecSonar ProSabaWinner
MakerPerplexityMistral AI
TypeProprietaryProprietary
Context window200K tokens33K tokensSonar Pro
Input price$3/M$0.2/MSaba
Output price$15/M$0.6/MSaba
Vision / multimodalYesNoSonar Pro
Tool / function callingNoYesSaba
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)
LicenseProprietaryProprietary

Price gap & when to choose each

25×cheaper per output token

Saba is ~25× cheaper than Sonar Pro on output tokens ($0.6 vs $15 per M tokens).

Choose Sonar Pro if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You need the longer 200K context window
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure
Choose Saba if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You want the lower output price
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

CapabilitySonar ProSaba
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

Benchmarks: Sonar Pro vs Saba

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

Sonar Pro
Saba
Intelligence index
7.6
6.5
GPQA
57.8%
42.4%
MMLU-Pro
75.5%
61.1%
Humanity's Last Exam
6.6%
4.3%
LiveCodeBench
27.5%
MATH-500
74.5%
67.7%
AIME
29%
13%
Speed
0 tok/s
0 tok/s
Latency
0s
0s

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How Sonar Pro and Saba score

🤝 Neck and neck on these criteria (2.6 vs 2.7 / 5).
CriterionSonar ProSaba
Cost-efficiency3.05.0
Context window4.02.5
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality3.53.5

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

Sonar Pro Paid

Perplexity · Proprietary

Note: Sonar Pro pricing includes Perplexity search pricing. See [details here](https://docs.perplexity.ai/guides/pricing#detailed-pricing-breakdown-for-sonar-reasoning-pro-and-sonar-pro) For enterprises seeking more advanced capabilities, t

Saba Paid

Mistral AI · Proprietary

Mistral Saba is a 24B-parameter language model specifically designed for the Middle East and South Asia, delivering accurate and contextually relevant responses while maintaining efficient performance. Trained on curated regional...

Frequently asked questions

Sonar Pro vs Saba — which is cheaper?

Saba is cheaper on output ($0.6/M vs $15/M).

Which has the larger context window?

Sonar Pro offers the larger context window (200K tokens).

Sonar Pro vs Saba — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Saba for the lower output price ($0.6/M vs $15/M). Choose Sonar Pro if you need the larger 200K context window.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →