AI Models · Paid vs Paid

Sonar Pro Paid vs RERelace Search Paid

Sonar Pro vs Relace Search compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

Sonar ProPaidPerplexity
$3 /M input
$15 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window200K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
RERelace SearchPaidRelace
$1 /M input
$3 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window256K tokens
MultimodalNo
Self-hostNo
Choose Relace Search for the lower output price ($3/M vs $15/M). It also gives you the larger 256K context window.

Sonar Pro vs Relace Search specs

SpecSonar ProRelace SearchWinner
MakerPerplexityRelace
TypeProprietaryProprietary
Context window200K tokens256K tokensRERelace Search
Input price$3/M$1/MRERelace Search
Output price$15/M$3/MRERelace Search
Vision / multimodalYesNoSonar Pro
Tool / function callingNoYesRERelace Search
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)
LicenseProprietaryProprietary

Price gap & when to choose each

5.0×cheaper per output token

Relace Search is ~5.0× cheaper than Sonar Pro on output tokens ($3 vs $15 per M tokens).

Choose Sonar Pro if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure
REChoose Relace Search if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You need the longer 256K context window
  • You want the lower output price
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

CapabilitySonar ProRelace Search
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

Benchmarks: Sonar Pro vs Relace Search

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

Sonar Pro
Relace Search
Intelligence index
7.6
GPQA
57.8%
MMLU-Pro
75.5%
Humanity's Last Exam
6.6%
LiveCodeBench
27.5%
MATH-500
74.5%
AIME
29%
Speed
0 tok/s
Latency
0s

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How Sonar Pro and Relace Search score

🤝 Neck and neck on these criteria (2.6 vs 2.8 / 5).
CriterionSonar ProRelace Search
Cost-efficiency3.04.0
Context window4.04.0
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality3.53.5

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

Sonar Pro Paid

Perplexity · Proprietary

Note: Sonar Pro pricing includes Perplexity search pricing. See [details here](https://docs.perplexity.ai/guides/pricing#detailed-pricing-breakdown-for-sonar-reasoning-pro-and-sonar-pro) For enterprises seeking more advanced capabilities, t

Relace Search Paid

Relace · Proprietary

The relace-search model uses 4-12 `view_file` and `grep` tools in parallel to explore a codebase and return relevant files to the user request. In contrast to RAG, relace-search performs agentic...

Frequently asked questions

Sonar Pro vs Relace Search — which is cheaper?

Relace Search is cheaper on output ($3/M vs $15/M).

Which has the larger context window?

Relace Search offers the larger context window (256K tokens).

Sonar Pro vs Relace Search — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Relace Search for the lower output price ($3/M vs $15/M). It also gives you the larger 256K context window.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →