AI Models · Paid vs Paid

Sonar Pro Paid vs INMercury 2 Paid

Sonar Pro vs Mercury 2 compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

Sonar ProPaidPerplexity
$3 /M input
$15 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window200K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
INMercury 2PaidInception
$0.25 /M input
$0.75 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window128K tokens
MultimodalNo
Self-hostNo
Choose Mercury 2 for the lower output price ($0.75/M vs $15/M). Choose Sonar Pro if you need the larger 200K context window.

Sonar Pro vs Mercury 2 specs

SpecSonar ProMercury 2Winner
MakerPerplexityInception
TypeProprietaryProprietary
Context window200K tokens128K tokensSonar Pro
Input price$3/M$0.25/MINMercury 2
Output price$15/M$0.75/MINMercury 2
Vision / multimodalYesNoSonar Pro
Tool / function callingNoYesINMercury 2
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)
LicenseProprietaryProprietary

Price gap & when to choose each

20×cheaper per output token

Mercury 2 is ~20× cheaper than Sonar Pro on output tokens ($0.75 vs $15 per M tokens).

Choose Sonar Pro if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You need the longer 200K context window
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure
INChoose Mercury 2 if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You want the lower output price
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

CapabilitySonar ProMercury 2
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

Benchmarks: Sonar Pro vs Mercury 2

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

Sonar Pro
Mercury 2
Intelligence index
7.6
11.5
GPQA
57.8%
77%
MMLU-Pro
75.5%
Humanity's Last Exam
6.6%
17.1%
LiveCodeBench
27.5%
MATH-500
74.5%
AIME
29%
Coding index
31.1
Long Context Reasoning
43.7%
SciCode
37.7%
IFBench
69.8%
τ²-Bench
70.8%
τ-Bench Banking
9.5%
Terminal-Bench
27.3%
Terminal-Bench Hard
26.5%
Speed
0 tok/s
1011.9 tok/s
Latency
0s
4.14s
Intelligence per $
30.7

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How Sonar Pro and Mercury 2 score

🏆 Best value & openness: Mercury 2 (2.9 vs 2.6 / 5)
CriterionSonar ProMercury 2
Cost-efficiency3.05.0
Context window4.03.5
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality3.53.5

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

Sonar Pro Paid

Perplexity · Proprietary

Note: Sonar Pro pricing includes Perplexity search pricing. See [details here](https://docs.perplexity.ai/guides/pricing#detailed-pricing-breakdown-for-sonar-reasoning-pro-and-sonar-pro) For enterprises seeking more advanced capabilities, t

Mercury 2 Paid

Inception · Proprietary

Mercury 2 is an extremely fast reasoning LLM, and the first reasoning diffusion LLM (dLLM). Instead of generating tokens sequentially, Mercury 2 produces and refines multiple tokens in parallel, achieving...

Frequently asked questions

Sonar Pro vs Mercury 2 — which is cheaper?

Mercury 2 is cheaper on output ($0.75/M vs $15/M).

Which has the larger context window?

Sonar Pro offers the larger context window (200K tokens).

Sonar Pro vs Mercury 2 — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Mercury 2 for the lower output price ($0.75/M vs $15/M). Choose Sonar Pro if you need the larger 200K context window.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →