AI Models · Paid vs Paid

Sonar Pro Paid vs GPT-6 Luna Paid

Sonar Pro vs GPT-6 Luna compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

Sonar ProPaidPerplexity
$3 /M input
$15 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window200K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
GPT-6 LunaPaidOpenAI
$0.1 /M input
$0.5 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window1.1M tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Choose GPT-6 Luna for the lower output price ($0.5/M vs $15/M). It also gives you the larger 1.1M context window.

Sonar Pro vs GPT-6 Luna specs

SpecSonar ProGPT-6 LunaWinner
MakerPerplexityOpenAI–
TypeProprietaryProprietary–
Context window200K tokens1.1M tokensGPT-6 Luna
Input price$3/M$0.1/MGPT-6 Luna
Output price$15/M$0.5/MGPT-6 Luna
Vision / multimodalYesYes= Tie
Tool / function callingNoYesGPT-6 Luna
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)–
LicenseProprietaryProprietary–

Price gap & when to choose each

30×cheaper per output token

GPT-6 Luna is ~30× cheaper than Sonar Pro on output tokens ($0.5 vs $15 per M tokens).

Choose Sonar Pro if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure
Choose GPT-6 Luna if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You need the longer 1.1M context window
  • You want the lower output price
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

CapabilitySonar ProGPT-6 Luna
Open weights (downloadable)✗✗
Self-hostable✗✗
Runs fully offline✗✗
Vision / multimodal✓✓
Tool / function calling✗✓
1M+ context window✗✓

Benchmarks: Sonar Pro vs GPT-6 Luna

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

Sonar Pro
GPT-6 Luna
Intelligence index
7.6
38.1
GPQA
57.8%
–
MMLU-Pro
75.5%
–
Humanity's Last Exam
6.6%
38.5%
LiveCodeBench
27.5%
–
MATH-500
74.5%
–
AIME
29%
–
Long Context Reasoning
–
83.3%
SciCode
–
54.6%
Speed
0 tok/s
136.9 tok/s
Latency
0s
63.93s
Intelligence per $
–
190.5

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How Sonar Pro and GPT-6 Luna score

🏆 Best value & openness: GPT-6 Luna (3.5 vs 2.6 / 5)
CriterionSonar ProGPT-6 Luna
Cost-efficiency3.05.0
Context window4.05.0
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality3.55.0

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

Sonar Pro Paid

Perplexity · Proprietary

Note: Sonar Pro pricing includes Perplexity search pricing. See [details here](https://docs.perplexity.ai/guides/pricing#detailed-pricing-breakdown-for-sonar-reasoning-pro-and-sonar-pro) For enterprises seeking more advanced capabilities, t

GPT-6 Luna Paid

OpenAI · Proprietary

GPT-6 Luna is the fast, cost-efficient model in OpenAI's GPT-6 series, positioned below GPT-6 Sol. It is suited for high-volume and latency-sensitive workloads such as chat, classification, and lightweight agentic...

Frequently asked questions

Sonar Pro vs GPT-6 Luna — which is cheaper?

GPT-6 Luna is cheaper on output ($0.5/M vs $15/M).

Which has the larger context window?

GPT-6 Luna offers the larger context window (1.1M tokens).

Sonar Pro vs GPT-6 Luna — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose GPT-6 Luna for the lower output price ($0.5/M vs $15/M). It also gives you the larger 1.1M context window.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →