AI Models · Paid vs Paid

Sonar Pro Paid vs GPT-4o (batch) Paid

Sonar Pro vs GPT-4o (batch) compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

Sonar ProPaidPerplexity
$3 /M input
$15 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window200K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
GPT-4o (batch)PaidOpenAI
$1.25 /M input
$5 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window128K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Choose GPT-4o (batch) for the lower output price ($5/M vs $15/M). Choose Sonar Pro if you need the larger 200K context window.

Sonar Pro vs GPT-4o (batch) specs

SpecSonar ProGPT-4o (batch)Winner
MakerPerplexityOpenAI
TypeProprietaryProprietary
Context window200K tokens128K tokensSonar Pro
Input price$3/M$1.25/MGPT-4o (batch)
Output price$15/M$5/MGPT-4o (batch)
Vision / multimodalYesYes= Tie
Tool / function callingNoYesGPT-4o (batch)
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)
LicenseProprietaryProprietary

Price gap & when to choose each

3.0×cheaper per output token

GPT-4o (batch) is ~3.0× cheaper than Sonar Pro on output tokens ($5 vs $15 per M tokens).

Choose Sonar Pro if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You need the longer 200K context window
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure
Choose GPT-4o (batch) if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You want the lower output price
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

CapabilitySonar ProGPT-4o (batch)
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

Benchmarks: Sonar Pro vs GPT-4o (batch)

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

Sonar Pro
GPT-4o (batch)
Intelligence index
7.6
9
GPQA
57.8%
65.5%
MMLU-Pro
75.5%
80.3%
Humanity's Last Exam
6.6%
4%
LiveCodeBench
27.5%
42.5%
MATH-500
74.5%
89.3%
AIME
29%
32.7%
Math index
25.7
AIME 2025
25.7%
Speed
0 tok/s
0 tok/s
Latency
0s
0s

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How Sonar Pro and GPT-4o (batch) score

🏆 Best value & openness: GPT-4o (batch) (3.0 vs 2.6 / 5)
CriterionSonar ProGPT-4o (batch)
Cost-efficiency3.04.0
Context window4.03.5
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality3.55.0

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

Sonar Pro Paid

Perplexity · Proprietary

Note: Sonar Pro pricing includes Perplexity search pricing. See [details here](https://docs.perplexity.ai/guides/pricing#detailed-pricing-breakdown-for-sonar-reasoning-pro-and-sonar-pro) For enterprises seeking more advanced capabilities, t

GPT-4o (batch) Paid

OpenAI · Proprietary

GPT-4o ("o" for "omni") is OpenAI's latest AI model, supporting both text and image inputs with text outputs. It maintains the intelligence level of [GPT-4 Turbo](/models/openai/gpt-4-turbo) while being twice as...

Frequently asked questions

Sonar Pro vs GPT-4o (batch) — which is cheaper?

GPT-4o (batch) is cheaper on output ($5/M vs $15/M).

Which has the larger context window?

Sonar Pro offers the larger context window (200K tokens).

Sonar Pro vs GPT-4o (batch) — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose GPT-4o (batch) for the lower output price ($5/M vs $15/M). Choose Sonar Pro if you need the larger 200K context window.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →