AI Models · Paid vs Paid

Sonar Pro Paid vs GPT-3.5 Turbo (batch) Paid

Sonar Pro vs GPT-3.5 Turbo (batch) compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

Sonar ProPaidPerplexity
$3 /M input
$15 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window200K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
GPT-3.5 Turbo (batch)PaidOpenAI
$0.25 /M input
$0.75 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window16K tokens
MultimodalNo
Self-hostNo
Choose GPT-3.5 Turbo (batch) for the lower output price ($0.75/M vs $15/M). Choose Sonar Pro if you need the larger 200K context window.

Sonar Pro vs GPT-3.5 Turbo (batch) specs

SpecSonar ProGPT-3.5 Turbo (batch)Winner
MakerPerplexityOpenAI
TypeProprietaryProprietary
Context window200K tokens16K tokensSonar Pro
Input price$3/M$0.25/MGPT-3.5 Turbo (batch)
Output price$15/M$0.75/MGPT-3.5 Turbo (batch)
Vision / multimodalYesNoSonar Pro
Tool / function callingNoYesGPT-3.5 Turbo (batch)
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)
LicenseProprietaryProprietary

Price gap & when to choose each

20×cheaper per output token

GPT-3.5 Turbo (batch) is ~20× cheaper than Sonar Pro on output tokens ($0.75 vs $15 per M tokens).

Choose Sonar Pro if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You need the longer 200K context window
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure
Choose GPT-3.5 Turbo (batch) if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You want the lower output price
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

CapabilitySonar ProGPT-3.5 Turbo (batch)
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

Benchmarks: Sonar Pro vs GPT-3.5 Turbo (batch)

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

Sonar Pro
GPT-3.5 Turbo (batch)
Intelligence index
7.6
5.5
GPQA
57.8%
29.7%
MMLU-Pro
75.5%
46.2%
Humanity's Last Exam
6.6%
LiveCodeBench
27.5%
MATH-500
74.5%
44.1%
AIME
29%
Coding index
10.7
Speed
0 tok/s
0 tok/s
Latency
0s
0s
Intelligence per $
7.3

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How Sonar Pro and GPT-3.5 Turbo (batch) score

🤝 Neck and neck on these criteria (2.6 vs 2.6 / 5).
CriterionSonar ProGPT-3.5 Turbo (batch)
Cost-efficiency3.05.0
Context window4.02.0
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality3.53.5

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

Sonar Pro Paid

Perplexity · Proprietary

Note: Sonar Pro pricing includes Perplexity search pricing. See [details here](https://docs.perplexity.ai/guides/pricing#detailed-pricing-breakdown-for-sonar-reasoning-pro-and-sonar-pro) For enterprises seeking more advanced capabilities, t

GPT-3.5 Turbo (batch) Paid

OpenAI · Proprietary

GPT-3.5 Turbo is OpenAI's fastest model. It can understand and generate natural language or code, and is optimized for chat and traditional completion tasks. Training data up to Sep 2021.

Frequently asked questions

Sonar Pro vs GPT-3.5 Turbo (batch) — which is cheaper?

GPT-3.5 Turbo (batch) is cheaper on output ($0.75/M vs $15/M).

Which has the larger context window?

Sonar Pro offers the larger context window (200K tokens).

Sonar Pro vs GPT-3.5 Turbo (batch) — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose GPT-3.5 Turbo (batch) for the lower output price ($0.75/M vs $15/M). Choose Sonar Pro if you need the larger 200K context window.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →