AI Models · Paid vs Paid

Sonar Pro Search Paid vs Muse Spark 1.1 Paid

Sonar Pro Search vs Muse Spark 1.1 compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

Sonar Pro SearchPaidPerplexity
$3 /M input
$15 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window200K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Muse Spark 1.1PaidMeta
$1.25 /M input
$4.25 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window1M tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Choose Muse Spark 1.1 for the lower output price ($4.25/M vs $15/M). It also gives you the larger 1M context window.

Sonar Pro Search vs Muse Spark 1.1 specs

SpecSonar Pro SearchMuse Spark 1.1Winner
MakerPerplexityMeta
TypeProprietaryProprietary
Context window200K tokens1M tokensMuse Spark 1.1
Input price$3/M$1.25/MMuse Spark 1.1
Output price$15/M$4.25/MMuse Spark 1.1
Vision / multimodalYesYes= Tie
Tool / function callingNoYesMuse Spark 1.1
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)
LicenseProprietaryProprietary

Price gap & when to choose each

3.5×cheaper per output token

Muse Spark 1.1 is ~3.5× cheaper than Sonar Pro Search on output tokens ($4.25 vs $15 per M tokens).

Choose Sonar Pro Search if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure
Choose Muse Spark 1.1 if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You need the longer 1M context window
  • You want the lower output price
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

CapabilitySonar Pro SearchMuse Spark 1.1
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

Benchmarks: Sonar Pro Search vs Muse Spark 1.1

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

Sonar Pro Search
Muse Spark 1.1
Intelligence index
34.3
Coding index
71.3
GPQA
89.8%
Humanity's Last Exam
46.2%
Long Context Reasoning
77.7%
SciCode
58.8%
τ-Bench Banking
31.8%
Terminal-Bench
77.9%
Speed
0 tok/s
Latency
0s
Intelligence per $
17.2

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How Sonar Pro Search and Muse Spark 1.1 score

🏆 Best value & openness: Muse Spark 1.1 (3.3 vs 2.6 / 5)
CriterionSonar Pro SearchMuse Spark 1.1
Cost-efficiency3.04.0
Context window4.05.0
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality3.55.0

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

Sonar Pro Search Paid

Perplexity · Proprietary

Exclusively available on the OpenRouter API, Sonar Pro's new Pro Search mode is Perplexity's most advanced agentic search system. It is designed for deeper reasoning and analysis. Pricing is based...

Muse Spark 1.1 Paid

Meta · Proprietary

Muse Spark 1.1 is a multimodal reasoning model from Meta, built for agentic tasks. It accepts text, images, video, audio, and PDF documents and returns text, with a 1M-token context...

Frequently asked questions

Sonar Pro Search vs Muse Spark 1.1 — which is cheaper?

Muse Spark 1.1 is cheaper on output ($4.25/M vs $15/M).

Which has the larger context window?

Muse Spark 1.1 offers the larger context window (1M tokens).

Sonar Pro Search vs Muse Spark 1.1 — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Muse Spark 1.1 for the lower output price ($4.25/M vs $15/M). It also gives you the larger 1M context window.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →