AI Models · Paid vs Paid

Sonar Pro Search Paid vs INMercury 2 Paid

Sonar Pro Search vs Mercury 2 compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

Sonar Pro SearchPaidPerplexity
$3 /M input
$15 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window200K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
INMercury 2PaidInception
$0.25 /M input
$0.75 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window128K tokens
MultimodalNo
Self-hostNo
Choose Mercury 2 for the lower output price ($0.75/M vs $15/M). Choose Sonar Pro Search if you need the larger 200K context window.

Sonar Pro Search vs Mercury 2 specs

SpecSonar Pro SearchMercury 2Winner
MakerPerplexityInception
TypeProprietaryProprietary
Context window200K tokens128K tokensSonar Pro Search
Input price$3/M$0.25/MINMercury 2
Output price$15/M$0.75/MINMercury 2
Vision / multimodalYesNoSonar Pro Search
Tool / function callingNoYesINMercury 2
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)
LicenseProprietaryProprietary

Price gap & when to choose each

20×cheaper per output token

Mercury 2 is ~20× cheaper than Sonar Pro Search on output tokens ($0.75 vs $15 per M tokens).

Choose Sonar Pro Search if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You need the longer 200K context window
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure
INChoose Mercury 2 if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You want the lower output price
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

CapabilitySonar Pro SearchMercury 2
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

Benchmarks: Sonar Pro Search vs Mercury 2

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

Sonar Pro Search
Mercury 2
Intelligence index
11.5
Coding index
31.1
GPQA
77%
Humanity's Last Exam
17.1%
Long Context Reasoning
43.7%
SciCode
37.7%
IFBench
69.8%
τ²-Bench
70.8%
τ-Bench Banking
9.5%
Terminal-Bench
27.3%
Terminal-Bench Hard
26.5%
Speed
1011.9 tok/s
Latency
4.14s
Intelligence per $
30.7

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How Sonar Pro Search and Mercury 2 score

🏆 Best value & openness: Mercury 2 (2.9 vs 2.6 / 5)
CriterionSonar Pro SearchMercury 2
Cost-efficiency3.05.0
Context window4.03.5
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality3.53.5

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

Sonar Pro Search Paid

Perplexity · Proprietary

Exclusively available on the OpenRouter API, Sonar Pro's new Pro Search mode is Perplexity's most advanced agentic search system. It is designed for deeper reasoning and analysis. Pricing is based...

Mercury 2 Paid

Inception · Proprietary

Mercury 2 is an extremely fast reasoning LLM, and the first reasoning diffusion LLM (dLLM). Instead of generating tokens sequentially, Mercury 2 produces and refines multiple tokens in parallel, achieving...

Frequently asked questions

Sonar Pro Search vs Mercury 2 — which is cheaper?

Mercury 2 is cheaper on output ($0.75/M vs $15/M).

Which has the larger context window?

Sonar Pro Search offers the larger context window (200K tokens).

Sonar Pro Search vs Mercury 2 — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Mercury 2 for the lower output price ($0.75/M vs $15/M). Choose Sonar Pro Search if you need the larger 200K context window.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →