AI Models · Paid vs Paid

Sonar Pro Search Paid vs GPT-5 Nano Paid

Sonar Pro Search vs GPT-5 Nano compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

Sonar Pro SearchPaidPerplexity
$3 /M input
$15 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window200K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
GPT-5 NanoPaidOpenAI
$0.05 /M input
$0.4 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window400K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Choose GPT-5 Nano for the lower output price ($0.4/M vs $15/M). It also gives you the larger 400K context window.

Sonar Pro Search vs GPT-5 Nano specs

SpecSonar Pro SearchGPT-5 NanoWinner
MakerPerplexityOpenAI
TypeProprietaryProprietary
Context window200K tokens400K tokensGPT-5 Nano
Input price$3/M$0.05/MGPT-5 Nano
Output price$15/M$0.4/MGPT-5 Nano
Vision / multimodalYesYes= Tie
Tool / function callingNoYesGPT-5 Nano
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)
LicenseProprietaryProprietary

Price gap & when to choose each

38×cheaper per output token

GPT-5 Nano is ~38× cheaper than Sonar Pro Search on output tokens ($0.4 vs $15 per M tokens).

Choose Sonar Pro Search if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure
Choose GPT-5 Nano if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You need the longer 400K context window
  • You want the lower output price
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

CapabilitySonar Pro SearchGPT-5 Nano
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

Benchmarks: Sonar Pro Search vs GPT-5 Nano

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

Sonar Pro Search
GPT-5 Nano
Intelligence index
13
Math index
83.7
GPQA
67.6%
MMLU-Pro
78%
Humanity's Last Exam
9.5%
Long Context Reasoning
45%
LiveCodeBench
78.9%
AIME 2025
83.7%
IFBench
67.6%
τ²-Bench
36.5%
Terminal-Bench Hard
12.1%
Speed
0 tok/s
Latency
0s
Intelligence per $
94.2

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How Sonar Pro Search and GPT-5 Nano score

🏆 Best value & openness: GPT-5 Nano (3.4 vs 2.6 / 5)
CriterionSonar Pro SearchGPT-5 Nano
Cost-efficiency3.05.0
Context window4.04.5
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality3.55.0

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

Sonar Pro Search Paid

Perplexity · Proprietary

Exclusively available on the OpenRouter API, Sonar Pro's new Pro Search mode is Perplexity's most advanced agentic search system. It is designed for deeper reasoning and analysis. Pricing is based...

GPT-5 Nano Paid

OpenAI · Proprietary

GPT-5-Nano is the smallest and fastest variant in the GPT-5 system, optimized for developer tools, rapid interactions, and ultra-low latency environments. While limited in reasoning depth compared to its larger...

Other models in these families

These variants are tracked but not compared here — one page per family keeps the comparison readable.

Other variants tracked
GPT-5.4 NanoGPT-5.4 Nano (batch)GPT-5 Nano (batch)

Frequently asked questions

Sonar Pro Search vs GPT-5 Nano — which is cheaper?

GPT-5 Nano is cheaper on output ($0.4/M vs $15/M).

Which has the larger context window?

GPT-5 Nano offers the larger context window (400K tokens).

Sonar Pro Search vs GPT-5 Nano — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose GPT-5 Nano for the lower output price ($0.4/M vs $15/M). It also gives you the larger 400K context window.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →