AI Models · Paid vs Paid

Sonar Pro Search Paid vs GPT-5.6 Luna Paid

Sonar Pro Search vs GPT-5.6 Luna compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

Sonar Pro SearchPaidPerplexity
$3 /M input
$15 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window200K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
GPT-5.6 LunaPaidOpenAI
$0.2 /M input
$1.2 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window1.1M tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Choose GPT-5.6 Luna for the lower output price ($1.2/M vs $15/M). It also gives you the larger 1.1M context window.

Sonar Pro Search vs GPT-5.6 Luna specs

SpecSonar Pro SearchGPT-5.6 LunaWinner
MakerPerplexityOpenAI
TypeProprietaryProprietary
Context window200K tokens1.1M tokensGPT-5.6 Luna
Input price$3/M$0.2/MGPT-5.6 Luna
Output price$15/M$1.2/MGPT-5.6 Luna
Vision / multimodalYesYes= Tie
Tool / function callingNoYesGPT-5.6 Luna
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)
LicenseProprietaryProprietary

Price gap & when to choose each

13×cheaper per output token

GPT-5.6 Luna is ~13× cheaper than Sonar Pro Search on output tokens ($1.2 vs $15 per M tokens).

Choose Sonar Pro Search if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure
Choose GPT-5.6 Luna if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You need the longer 1.1M context window
  • You want the lower output price
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

CapabilitySonar Pro SearchGPT-5.6 Luna
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

Benchmarks: Sonar Pro Search vs GPT-5.6 Luna

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

Sonar Pro Search
GPT-5.6 Luna
Intelligence index
37.5
Coding index
71.4
GPQA
91.1%
Humanity's Last Exam
39.5%
Long Context Reasoning
83.7%
SciCode
53.6%
τ-Bench Banking
31.1%
Terminal-Bench
80.9%
Speed
121.3 tok/s
Latency
96.08s
Intelligence per $
83.3

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How Sonar Pro Search and GPT-5.6 Luna score

🏆 Best value & openness: GPT-5.6 Luna (3.4 vs 2.6 / 5)
CriterionSonar Pro SearchGPT-5.6 Luna
Cost-efficiency3.04.5
Context window4.05.0
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality3.55.0

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

Sonar Pro Search Paid

Perplexity · Proprietary

Exclusively available on the OpenRouter API, Sonar Pro's new Pro Search mode is Perplexity's most advanced agentic search system. It is designed for deeper reasoning and analysis. Pricing is based...

GPT-5.6 Luna Paid

OpenAI · Proprietary

GPT-5.6 Luna is a fast, cost-efficient model in OpenAI's GPT-5.6 series. It is suited for high-volume, latency-sensitive tasks such as chat, classification, and lightweight agentic workflows, providing capable reasoning for...

Frequently asked questions

Sonar Pro Search vs GPT-5.6 Luna — which is cheaper?

GPT-5.6 Luna is cheaper on output ($1.2/M vs $15/M).

Which has the larger context window?

GPT-5.6 Luna offers the larger context window (1.1M tokens).

Sonar Pro Search vs GPT-5.6 Luna — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose GPT-5.6 Luna for the lower output price ($1.2/M vs $15/M). It also gives you the larger 1.1M context window.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →