AI Models · Paid vs Paid

Sonar Pro Search Paid vs GPT-4.1 Paid

Sonar Pro Search vs GPT-4.1 compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

Sonar Pro SearchPaidPerplexity
$3 /M input
$15 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window200K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
GPT-4.1PaidOpenAI
$2 /M input
$8 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window1M tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Choose GPT-4.1 for the lower output price ($8/M vs $15/M). It also gives you the larger 1M context window.

Sonar Pro Search vs GPT-4.1 specs

SpecSonar Pro SearchGPT-4.1Winner
MakerPerplexityOpenAI
TypeProprietaryProprietary
Context window200K tokens1M tokensGPT-4.1
Input price$3/M$2/MGPT-4.1
Output price$15/M$8/MGPT-4.1
Vision / multimodalYesYes= Tie
Tool / function callingNoYesGPT-4.1
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)
LicenseProprietaryProprietary

Price gap & when to choose each

1.9×cheaper per output token

GPT-4.1 is ~1.9× cheaper than Sonar Pro Search on output tokens ($8 vs $15 per M tokens).

Choose Sonar Pro Search if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure
Choose GPT-4.1 if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You need the longer 1M context window
  • You want the lower output price
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

CapabilitySonar Pro SearchGPT-4.1
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

Benchmarks: Sonar Pro Search vs GPT-4.1

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

Sonar Pro Search
GPT-4.1
Intelligence index
12.7
Math index
34.7
GPQA
66.6%
MMLU-Pro
80.6%
Humanity's Last Exam
4.2%
Long Context Reasoning
68.3%
LiveCodeBench
45.7%
MATH-500
91.3%
AIME
43.7%
AIME 2025
34.7%
IFBench
43%
τ²-Bench
47.1%
Terminal-Bench Hard
13.6%
Speed
0 tok/s
Latency
0s
Intelligence per $
3.6

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How Sonar Pro Search and GPT-4.1 score

🏆 Best value & openness: GPT-4.1 (3.2 vs 2.6 / 5)
CriterionSonar Pro SearchGPT-4.1
Cost-efficiency3.03.5
Context window4.05.0
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality3.55.0

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

Sonar Pro Search Paid

Perplexity · Proprietary

Exclusively available on the OpenRouter API, Sonar Pro's new Pro Search mode is Perplexity's most advanced agentic search system. It is designed for deeper reasoning and analysis. Pricing is based...

GPT-4.1 Paid

OpenAI · Proprietary

GPT-4.1 is a flagship large language model optimized for advanced instruction following, real-world software engineering, and long-context reasoning. It supports a 1 million token context window and outperforms GPT-4o and...

Other models in these families

These variants are tracked but not compared here — one page per family keeps the comparison readable.

Other variants tracked
GPT-4.1 (batch)GPT-4.1 MiniGPT-4.1 Mini (batch)GPT-4.1 NanoGPT-4.1 Nano (batch)

Frequently asked questions

Sonar Pro Search vs GPT-4.1 — which is cheaper?

GPT-4.1 is cheaper on output ($8/M vs $15/M).

Which has the larger context window?

GPT-4.1 offers the larger context window (1M tokens).

Sonar Pro Search vs GPT-4.1 — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose GPT-4.1 for the lower output price ($8/M vs $15/M). It also gives you the larger 1M context window.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →