Sonar Pro Search vs Claude Sonnet 5 compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.
Sonar Pro Search — full profile › · Claude Sonnet 5 — full profile ›
Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai
Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.
| Spec | Sonar Pro Search | Claude Sonnet 5 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maker | Perplexity | Anthropic | – |
| Type | Proprietary | Proprietary | – |
| Context window | 200K tokens | 1M tokens | |
| Input price | $3/M | $2/M | |
| Output price | $15/M | $10/M | |
| Vision / multimodal | Yes | Yes | = Tie |
| Tool / function calling | No | Yes | |
| Self-hostable | No (API only) | No (API only) | – |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary | – |
Claude Sonnet 5 is ~1.5× cheaper than Sonar Pro Search on output tokens ($10 vs $15 per M tokens).
| Capability | Sonar Pro Search | Claude Sonnet 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Open weights (downloadable) | ✗ | ✗ |
| Self-hostable | ✗ | ✗ |
| Runs fully offline | ✗ | ✗ |
| Vision / multimodal | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tool / function calling | ✗ | ✓ |
| 1M+ context window | ✗ | ✓ |
Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).
Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.
| Criterion | Sonar Pro Search | Claude Sonnet 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost-efficiency | 3.0 | 3.5 |
| Context window | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| Openness | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Self-hosting | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Multimodality | 3.5 | 5.0 |
Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.
Exclusively available on the OpenRouter API, Sonar Pro's new Pro Search mode is Perplexity's most advanced agentic search system. It is designed for deeper reasoning and analysis. Pricing is based...
Sonnet 5 is Anthropic's most capable Sonnet-class model, with frontier performance across coding, agents, and professional work. It supports adaptive thinking with selectable reasoning effort levels (low, medium, high, max,...
These variants are tracked but not compared here — one page per family keeps the comparison readable.
Claude Sonnet 5 is cheaper on output ($10/M vs $15/M).
Claude Sonnet 5 offers the larger context window (1M tokens).
Choose Claude Sonnet 5 for the lower output price ($10/M vs $15/M). It also gives you the larger 1M context window.
Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.
Open the leaderboard →