AI Models · Paid vs Paid

Sonar Deep Research Paid vs Seed 1.6 Flash Paid

Sonar Deep Research vs Seed 1.6 Flash compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

Sonar Deep ResearchPaidPerplexity
$2 /M input
$8 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window128K tokens
MultimodalNo
Self-hostNo
Seed 1.6 FlashPaidByteDance Seed
$0.08 /M input
$0.3 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window262K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Choose Seed 1.6 Flash for the lower output price ($0.3/M vs $8/M). It also gives you the larger 262K context window.

Sonar Deep Research vs Seed 1.6 Flash specs

SpecSonar Deep ResearchSeed 1.6 FlashWinner
MakerPerplexityByteDance Seed
TypeProprietaryProprietary
Context window128K tokens262K tokensSeed 1.6 Flash
Input price$2/M$0.08/MSeed 1.6 Flash
Output price$8/M$0.3/MSeed 1.6 Flash
Vision / multimodalNoYesSeed 1.6 Flash
Tool / function callingNoYesSeed 1.6 Flash
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)
LicenseProprietaryProprietary

Price gap & when to choose each

27×cheaper per output token

Seed 1.6 Flash is ~27× cheaper than Sonar Deep Research on output tokens ($0.3 vs $8 per M tokens).

Choose Sonar Deep Research if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure
Choose Seed 1.6 Flash if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You need the longer 262K context window
  • You want the lower output price
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

CapabilitySonar Deep ResearchSeed 1.6 Flash
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

How Sonar Deep Research and Seed 1.6 Flash score

🏆 Best value & openness: Seed 1.6 Flash (3.3 vs 2.3 / 5)
CriterionSonar Deep ResearchSeed 1.6 Flash
Cost-efficiency3.55.0
Context window3.54.0
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality2.05.0

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

Sonar Deep Research Paid

Perplexity · Proprietary

Sonar Deep Research is a research-focused model designed for multi-step retrieval, synthesis, and reasoning across complex topics. It autonomously searches, reads, and evaluates sources, refining its approach as it gathers...

Seed 1.6 Flash Paid

ByteDance Seed · Proprietary

Seed 1.6 Flash is an ultra-fast multimodal deep thinking model by ByteDance Seed, supporting both text and visual understanding. It features a 256k context window and can generate outputs of...

Frequently asked questions

Sonar Deep Research vs Seed 1.6 Flash — which is cheaper?

Seed 1.6 Flash is cheaper on output ($0.3/M vs $8/M).

Which has the larger context window?

Seed 1.6 Flash offers the larger context window (262K tokens).

Sonar Deep Research vs Seed 1.6 Flash — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Seed 1.6 Flash for the lower output price ($0.3/M vs $8/M). It also gives you the larger 262K context window.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →