AI Models · Paid vs Paid

Sonar Deep Research Paid vs GPT-3.5 Turbo (batch) Paid

Sonar Deep Research vs GPT-3.5 Turbo (batch) compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

Sonar Deep ResearchPaidPerplexity
$2 /M input
$8 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window128K tokens
MultimodalNo
Self-hostNo
GPT-3.5 Turbo (batch)PaidOpenAI
$0.25 /M input
$0.75 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window16K tokens
MultimodalNo
Self-hostNo
Choose GPT-3.5 Turbo (batch) for the lower output price ($0.75/M vs $8/M). Choose Sonar Deep Research if you need the larger 128K context window.

Sonar Deep Research vs GPT-3.5 Turbo (batch) specs

SpecSonar Deep ResearchGPT-3.5 Turbo (batch)Winner
MakerPerplexityOpenAI
TypeProprietaryProprietary
Context window128K tokens16K tokensSonar Deep Research
Input price$2/M$0.25/MGPT-3.5 Turbo (batch)
Output price$8/M$0.75/MGPT-3.5 Turbo (batch)
Vision / multimodalNoNo
Tool / function callingNoYesGPT-3.5 Turbo (batch)
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)
LicenseProprietaryProprietary

Price gap & when to choose each

11×cheaper per output token

GPT-3.5 Turbo (batch) is ~11× cheaper than Sonar Deep Research on output tokens ($0.75 vs $8 per M tokens).

Choose Sonar Deep Research if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You need the longer 128K context window
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure
Choose GPT-3.5 Turbo (batch) if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You want the lower output price
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

CapabilitySonar Deep ResearchGPT-3.5 Turbo (batch)
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

Benchmarks: Sonar Deep Research vs GPT-3.5 Turbo (batch)

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

Sonar Deep Research
GPT-3.5 Turbo (batch)
Intelligence index
5.5
Coding index
10.7
GPQA
29.7%
MMLU-Pro
46.2%
MATH-500
44.1%
Speed
0 tok/s
Latency
0s
Intelligence per $
7.3

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How Sonar Deep Research and GPT-3.5 Turbo (batch) score

🏆 Best value & openness: GPT-3.5 Turbo (batch) (2.6 vs 2.3 / 5)
CriterionSonar Deep ResearchGPT-3.5 Turbo (batch)
Cost-efficiency3.55.0
Context window3.52.0
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality2.03.5

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

Sonar Deep Research Paid

Perplexity · Proprietary

Sonar Deep Research is a research-focused model designed for multi-step retrieval, synthesis, and reasoning across complex topics. It autonomously searches, reads, and evaluates sources, refining its approach as it gathers...

GPT-3.5 Turbo (batch) Paid

OpenAI · Proprietary

GPT-3.5 Turbo is OpenAI's fastest model. It can understand and generate natural language or code, and is optimized for chat and traditional completion tasks. Training data up to Sep 2021.

Frequently asked questions

Sonar Deep Research vs GPT-3.5 Turbo (batch) — which is cheaper?

GPT-3.5 Turbo (batch) is cheaper on output ($0.75/M vs $8/M).

Which has the larger context window?

Sonar Deep Research offers the larger context window (128K tokens).

Sonar Deep Research vs GPT-3.5 Turbo (batch) — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose GPT-3.5 Turbo (batch) for the lower output price ($0.75/M vs $8/M). Choose Sonar Deep Research if you need the larger 128K context window.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →