AI Models · Open-Source vs Paid

Reka Flash 3 Open vs SASakana Namazu Paid

Reka Flash 3 vs Sakana Namazu compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Can the open-source model replace the paid one? Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

Reka Flash 3OpenRekaai
$0.1 /M input
$0.2 /M outputNo per-token fees if you self-host
TypeOpen-weight
Context window66K tokens
MultimodalNo
Self-hostYes
SASakana NamazuPaidSakana AI
$0.95 /M input
$4 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window262K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Choose Reka Flash 3 if you want to self-host, keep your data private and skip per-token fees — it's open-weight and runs on your own hardware. Choose Sakana Namazu if you want frontier capability through a managed API with zero infrastructure to run.

Reka Flash 3 vs Sakana Namazu specs

SpecReka Flash 3Sakana NamazuWinner
MakerRekaaiSakana AI
TypeOpen-weightProprietaryReka Flash 3
Context window66K tokens262K tokensSASakana Namazu
Input price$0.1/M · free self-host$0.95/MReka Flash 3
Output price$0.2/M · free self-host$4/MReka Flash 3
Vision / multimodalNoYesSASakana Namazu
Tool / function callingNoYesSASakana Namazu
Self-hostableYesNo (API only)Reka Flash 3
LicenseOpen weightsProprietaryReka Flash 3

Price gap & when to choose each

20×cheaper per output token

Reka Flash 3 is ~20× cheaper than Sakana Namazu on output tokens ($0.2 vs $4 per M tokens).

Choose Reka Flash 3 if…
  • You want to self-host or run on your cloud
  • You prioritize data privacy & control
  • You want the lowest operating costs
  • You are building open or reproducible AI
SAChoose Sakana Namazu if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You need the longer 262K context window
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

CapabilityReka Flash 3Sakana Namazu
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

Benchmarks: Reka Flash 3 vs Sakana Namazu

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

Reka Flash 3
Sakana Namazu
Intelligence index
5.6
Math index
33.7
GPQA
52.9%
MMLU-Pro
66.9%
Humanity's Last Exam
4.4%
Long Context Reasoning
0%
LiveCodeBench
43.5%
MATH-500
89.3%
AIME
51%
AIME 2025
33.7%
IFBench
30.4%
τ²-Bench
0%
Terminal-Bench Hard
0%
Speed
85.9 tok/s
Latency
0.88s
Intelligence per $
16

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How Reka Flash 3 and Sakana Namazu score

🏆 Best value & openness: Reka Flash 3 (4.0 vs 3.1 / 5)
CriterionReka Flash 3Sakana Namazu
Cost-efficiency5.04.0
Context window3.04.0
Openness5.01.5
Self-hosting5.01.0
Multimodality2.05.0

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

Reka Flash 3 Open

Rekaai · Open-weight

Reka Flash 3 is a general-purpose, instruction-tuned large language model with 21 billion parameters, developed by Reka. It excels at general chat, coding tasks, instruction-following, and function calling. Featuring a...

Sakana Namazu Paid

Sakana AI · Proprietary

Sakana Namazu is a Japanese-specialized reasoning model from Sakana AI, based on Kimi K2.6 with additional training for Japanese language and business contexts. It is suited for Japanese instruction following,...

Other models in these families

These variants are tracked but not compared here — one page per family keeps the comparison readable.

Other variants tracked
Reka Edge

Frequently asked questions

Is Reka Flash 3 as good as Sakana Namazu?

Reka Flash 3 is open-weight and competitive on many tasks, but Sakana Namazu may still lead on the hardest reasoning and agentic work. The gap keeps narrowing — benchmark both on your actual use case before deciding.

Can I run Reka Flash 3 locally?

Yes. Reka Flash 3 has open weights, so you can self-host it on your own GPUs or run it via a low-cost API. Sakana Namazu is API-only and cannot be self-hosted.

How much cheaper is Reka Flash 3?

Reka Flash 3 costs $0.2/M output vs $4/M for Sakana Namazu — roughly 20x cheaper via API, and free if you self-host.

Reka Flash 3 vs Sakana Namazu — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Reka Flash 3 if you want to self-host, keep your data private and skip per-token fees — it's open-weight and runs on your own hardware. Choose Sakana Namazu if you want frontier capability through a managed API with zero infrastructure to run.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →