Reka Flash 3 vs Sakana Namazu compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Can the open-source model replace the paid one? Full 2026 breakdown.
Sakana Namazu — full profile ›
Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai
Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.
| Spec | Reka Flash 3 | Sakana Namazu | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maker | Rekaai | Sakana AI | – |
| Type | Open-weight | Proprietary | |
| Context window | 66K tokens | 262K tokens | SASakana Namazu |
| Input price | $0.1/M · free self-host | $0.95/M | |
| Output price | $0.2/M · free self-host | $4/M | |
| Vision / multimodal | No | Yes | SASakana Namazu |
| Tool / function calling | No | Yes | SASakana Namazu |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No (API only) | |
| License | Open weights | Proprietary |
Reka Flash 3 is ~20× cheaper than Sakana Namazu on output tokens ($0.2 vs $4 per M tokens).
| Capability | Reka Flash 3 | Sakana Namazu |
|---|---|---|
| Open weights (downloadable) | ✓ | ✗ |
| Self-hostable | ✓ | ✗ |
| Runs fully offline | ✓ | ✗ |
| Vision / multimodal | ✗ | ✓ |
| Tool / function calling | ✗ | ✓ |
| 1M+ context window | ✗ | ✗ |
Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).
Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.
| Criterion | Reka Flash 3 | Sakana Namazu |
|---|---|---|
| Cost-efficiency | 5.0 | 4.0 |
| Context window | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| Openness | 5.0 | 1.5 |
| Self-hosting | 5.0 | 1.0 |
| Multimodality | 2.0 | 5.0 |
Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.
Reka Flash 3 is a general-purpose, instruction-tuned large language model with 21 billion parameters, developed by Reka. It excels at general chat, coding tasks, instruction-following, and function calling. Featuring a...
Sakana Namazu is a Japanese-specialized reasoning model from Sakana AI, based on Kimi K2.6 with additional training for Japanese language and business contexts. It is suited for Japanese instruction following,...
These variants are tracked but not compared here — one page per family keeps the comparison readable.
Reka Flash 3 is open-weight and competitive on many tasks, but Sakana Namazu may still lead on the hardest reasoning and agentic work. The gap keeps narrowing — benchmark both on your actual use case before deciding.
Yes. Reka Flash 3 has open weights, so you can self-host it on your own GPUs or run it via a low-cost API. Sakana Namazu is API-only and cannot be self-hosted.
Reka Flash 3 costs $0.2/M output vs $4/M for Sakana Namazu — roughly 20x cheaper via API, and free if you self-host.
Choose Reka Flash 3 if you want to self-host, keep your data private and skip per-token fees — it's open-weight and runs on your own hardware. Choose Sakana Namazu if you want frontier capability through a managed API with zero infrastructure to run.
Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.
Open the leaderboard →