Beam 1.0 501B A23B vs Nano Banana 2.1 compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Can the open-source model replace the paid one? Full 2026 breakdown.
Nano Banana 2.1 — full profile ›
Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai
Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.
| Spec | Beam 1.0 501B A23B | Nano Banana 2.1 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maker | Reflection | – | |
| Type | Open-weight | Proprietary | REBeam 1.0 501B A23B |
| Context window | 1M tokens | 66K tokens | REBeam 1.0 501B A23B |
| Input price | $0.25/M · free self-host | $1.5/M | REBeam 1.0 501B A23B |
| Output price | $1/M · free self-host | $7.5/M | REBeam 1.0 501B A23B |
| Vision / multimodal | No | Yes | |
| Tool / function calling | Yes | Yes | = Tie |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No (API only) | REBeam 1.0 501B A23B |
| License | Open weights | Proprietary | REBeam 1.0 501B A23B |
Beam 1.0 501B A23B is ~7.5× cheaper than Nano Banana 2.1 on output tokens ($1 vs $7.5 per M tokens).
| Capability | Beam 1.0 501B A23B | Nano Banana 2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Open weights (downloadable) | ✓ | ✗ |
| Self-hostable | ✓ | ✗ |
| Runs fully offline | ✓ | ✗ |
| Vision / multimodal | ✗ | ✓ |
| Tool / function calling | ✓ | ✓ |
| 1M+ context window | ✓ | ✗ |
Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).
Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.
| Criterion | Beam 1.0 501B A23B | Nano Banana 2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost-efficiency | 4.5 | 4.0 |
| Context window | 5.0 | 3.0 |
| Openness | 5.0 | 1.5 |
| Self-hosting | 5.0 | 1.0 |
| Multimodality | 3.5 | 5.0 |
Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.
Beam 1.0 is Reflection's open-weight reasoning model for coding and long-horizon agentic workflows. It uses a sparse mixture-of-experts architecture with 501B total and 23B active parameters per token, and a...
Nano Banana 2.1 (Gemini Nano Banana 2.1) is Google's image generation and editing model on the Flash tier, succeeding Nano Banana 2 and Nano Banana Pro. It improves product recontextualization,...
Beam 1.0 501B A23B is open-weight and competitive on many tasks, but Nano Banana 2.1 may still lead on the hardest reasoning and agentic work. The gap keeps narrowing — benchmark both on your actual use case before deciding.
Yes. Beam 1.0 501B A23B has open weights, so you can self-host it on your own GPUs or run it via a low-cost API. Nano Banana 2.1 is API-only and cannot be self-hosted.
Beam 1.0 501B A23B costs $1/M output vs $7.5/M for Nano Banana 2.1 — roughly 8x cheaper via API, and free if you self-host.
Choose Beam 1.0 501B A23B if you want to self-host, keep your data private and skip per-token fees — it's open-weight and runs on your own hardware. Choose Nano Banana 2.1 if you want frontier capability through a managed API with zero infrastructure to run.
Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.
Open the leaderboard →