AI Models · Open-Source vs Paid

REBeam 1.0 501B A23B Open vs GPT-4.1 Paid

Beam 1.0 501B A23B vs GPT-4.1 compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Can the open-source model replace the paid one? Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

REBeam 1.0 501B A23BOpenReflection
$0.25 /M input
$1 /M outputNo per-token fees if you self-host
TypeOpen-weight
Context window1M tokens
MultimodalNo
Self-hostYes
GPT-4.1PaidOpenAI
$2 /M input
$8 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window1M tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Choose Beam 1.0 501B A23B if you want to self-host, keep your data private and skip per-token fees — it's open-weight and runs on your own hardware. Choose GPT-4.1 if you want frontier capability through a managed API with zero infrastructure to run.

Beam 1.0 501B A23B vs GPT-4.1 specs

SpecBeam 1.0 501B A23BGPT-4.1Winner
MakerReflectionOpenAI–
TypeOpen-weightProprietaryREBeam 1.0 501B A23B
Context window1M tokens1M tokensREBeam 1.0 501B A23B
Input price$0.25/M · free self-host$2/MREBeam 1.0 501B A23B
Output price$1/M · free self-host$8/MREBeam 1.0 501B A23B
Vision / multimodalNoYesGPT-4.1
Tool / function callingYesYes= Tie
Self-hostableYesNo (API only)REBeam 1.0 501B A23B
LicenseOpen weightsProprietaryREBeam 1.0 501B A23B

Price gap & when to choose each

8.0×cheaper per output token

Beam 1.0 501B A23B is ~8.0× cheaper than GPT-4.1 on output tokens ($1 vs $8 per M tokens).

REChoose Beam 1.0 501B A23B if…
  • You want to self-host or run on your cloud
  • You need the longer 1M context window
  • You prioritize data privacy & control
  • You want the lowest operating costs
  • You are building open or reproducible AI
Choose GPT-4.1 if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

CapabilityBeam 1.0 501B A23BGPT-4.1
Open weights (downloadable)✓✗
Self-hostable✓✗
Runs fully offline✓✗
Vision / multimodal✗✓
Tool / function calling✓✓
1M+ context window✓✓

Benchmarks: Beam 1.0 501B A23B vs GPT-4.1

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

Beam 1.0 501B A23B delivers 14× more intelligence per dollar.
Beam 1.0 501B A23B
GPT-4.1
Intelligence index
30.3
12.7
Humanity's Last Exam
34.7%
4.2%
Long Context Reasoning
78%
68.3%
SciCode
48.5%
–
Math index
–
34.7
GPQA
–
66.6%
MMLU-Pro
–
80.6%
LiveCodeBench
–
45.7%
MATH-500
–
91.3%
AIME
–
43.7%
AIME 2025
–
34.7%
IFBench
–
43%
τ²-Bench
–
47.1%
Terminal-Bench Hard
–
13.6%
Speed
391.1 tok/s
0 tok/s
Latency
0.5s
0s
Intelligence per $
50.5
3.6

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How Beam 1.0 501B A23B and GPT-4.1 score

🏆 Best value & openness: Beam 1.0 501B A23B (4.6 vs 3.2 / 5)
CriterionBeam 1.0 501B A23BGPT-4.1
Cost-efficiency4.53.5
Context window5.05.0
Openness5.01.5
Self-hosting5.01.0
Multimodality3.55.0

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

Beam 1.0 501B A23B Open

Reflection · Open-weight

Beam 1.0 is Reflection's open-weight reasoning model for coding and long-horizon agentic workflows. It uses a sparse mixture-of-experts architecture with 501B total and 23B active parameters per token, and a...

GPT-4.1 Paid

OpenAI · Proprietary

GPT-4.1 is a flagship large language model optimized for advanced instruction following, real-world software engineering, and long-context reasoning. It supports a 1 million token context window and outperforms GPT-4o and...

Other models in these families

These variants are tracked but not compared here — one page per family keeps the comparison readable.

Other variants tracked
GPT-4.1 (batch)GPT-4.1 MiniGPT-4.1 Mini (batch)GPT-4.1 NanoGPT-4.1 Nano (batch)

Frequently asked questions

Is Beam 1.0 501B A23B as good as GPT-4.1?

Beam 1.0 501B A23B is open-weight and competitive on many tasks, but GPT-4.1 may still lead on the hardest reasoning and agentic work. The gap keeps narrowing — benchmark both on your actual use case before deciding.

Can I run Beam 1.0 501B A23B locally?

Yes. Beam 1.0 501B A23B has open weights, so you can self-host it on your own GPUs or run it via a low-cost API. GPT-4.1 is API-only and cannot be self-hosted.

How much cheaper is Beam 1.0 501B A23B?

Beam 1.0 501B A23B costs $1/M output vs $8/M for GPT-4.1 — roughly 8x cheaper via API, and free if you self-host.

Beam 1.0 501B A23B vs GPT-4.1 — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Beam 1.0 501B A23B if you want to self-host, keep your data private and skip per-token fees — it's open-weight and runs on your own hardware. Choose GPT-4.1 if you want frontier capability through a managed API with zero infrastructure to run.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →