WRPalmyra X5 Paid vs 
Saba Paid
Palmyra X5 vs Saba compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.
Palmyra X5 — full profile › · Saba — full profile ›
Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai
Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.
$6 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
$0.6 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
Palmyra X5 vs Saba specs
| Spec | Palmyra X5 | Saba | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maker | Writer | Mistral AI | – |
| Type | Proprietary | Proprietary | – |
| Context window | 1M tokens | 33K tokens | WRPalmyra X5 |
| Input price | $0.6/M | $0.2/M | |
| Output price | $6/M | $0.6/M | |
| Vision / multimodal | No | No | – |
| Tool / function calling | No | Yes | |
| Self-hostable | No (API only) | No (API only) | – |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary | – |
Price gap & when to choose each
Saba is ~10× cheaper than Palmyra X5 on output tokens ($0.6 vs $6 per M tokens).
- You want frontier performance through a managed API
- You need the longer 1M context window
- You value reliability & ecosystem
- You don't want to manage infrastructure
- You want frontier performance through a managed API
- You want the lower output price
- You value reliability & ecosystem
- You don't want to manage infrastructure
Feature comparison
| Capability | Palmyra X5 | Saba |
|---|---|---|
| Open weights (downloadable) | ✗ | ✗ |
| Self-hostable | ✗ | ✗ |
| Runs fully offline | ✗ | ✗ |
| Vision / multimodal | ✗ | ✗ |
| Tool / function calling | ✗ | ✓ |
| 1M+ context window | ✓ | ✗ |
Benchmarks: Palmyra X5 vs Saba
Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).
Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.
How Palmyra X5 and Saba score
| Criterion | Palmyra X5 | Saba |
|---|---|---|
| Cost-efficiency | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| Context window | 5.0 | 2.5 |
| Openness | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Self-hosting | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Multimodality | 2.0 | 3.5 |
Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.
What each model is
Palmyra X5 Paid
Palmyra X5 is Writer's most advanced model, purpose-built for building and scaling AI agents across the enterprise. It delivers industry-leading speed and efficiency on context windows up to 1 million...
Saba Paid
Mistral Saba is a 24B-parameter language model specifically designed for the Middle East and South Asia, delivering accurate and contextually relevant responses while maintaining efficient performance. Trained on curated regional...
Frequently asked questions
Palmyra X5 vs Saba — which is cheaper?
Saba is cheaper on output ($0.6/M vs $6/M).
Which has the larger context window?
Palmyra X5 offers the larger context window (1M tokens).
Palmyra X5 vs Saba — which should I pick in 2026?
Choose Saba for the lower output price ($0.6/M vs $6/M). Choose Palmyra X5 if you need the larger 1M context window.
People also compare
Explore more open-source AI
Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.
Open the leaderboard →