AI Models · Paid vs Paid

o1 Paid vs Seed 1.6 Flash Paid

o1 vs Seed 1.6 Flash compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

o1PaidOpenAI
$15 /M input
$60 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window200K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Seed 1.6 FlashPaidByteDance Seed
$0.08 /M input
$0.3 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window262K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Choose Seed 1.6 Flash for the lower output price ($0.3/M vs $60/M). It also gives you the larger 262K context window.

o1 vs Seed 1.6 Flash specs

Speco1Seed 1.6 FlashWinner
MakerOpenAIByteDance Seed
TypeProprietaryProprietary
Context window200K tokens262K tokensSeed 1.6 Flash
Input price$15/M$0.08/MSeed 1.6 Flash
Output price$60/M$0.3/MSeed 1.6 Flash
Vision / multimodalYesYes= Tie
Tool / function callingYesYes= Tie
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)
LicenseProprietaryProprietary

Price gap & when to choose each

200×cheaper per output token

Seed 1.6 Flash is ~200× cheaper than o1 on output tokens ($0.3 vs $60 per M tokens).

Choose o1 if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure
Choose Seed 1.6 Flash if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You need the longer 262K context window
  • You want the lower output price
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

Capabilityo1Seed 1.6 Flash
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

Benchmarks: o1 vs Seed 1.6 Flash

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

o1
Seed 1.6 Flash
Intelligence index
15.2
Coding index
39.7
GPQA
74.7%
MMLU-Pro
84.1%
Humanity's Last Exam
7%
Long Context Reasoning
65%
LiveCodeBench
67.9%
MATH-500
97%
AIME
72.3%
IFBench
70.3%
τ²-Bench
62.6%
Terminal-Bench Hard
12.9%
Speed
0 tok/s
Latency
0s
Intelligence per $
0.6

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How o1 and Seed 1.6 Flash score

🏆 Best value & openness: Seed 1.6 Flash (3.3 vs 2.7 / 5)
Criteriono1Seed 1.6 Flash
Cost-efficiency2.05.0
Context window4.04.0
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality5.05.0

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

o1 Paid

OpenAI · Proprietary

The latest and strongest model family from OpenAI, o1 is designed to spend more time thinking before responding. The o1 model series is trained with large-scale reinforcement learning to reason...

Seed 1.6 Flash Paid

ByteDance Seed · Proprietary

Seed 1.6 Flash is an ultra-fast multimodal deep thinking model by ByteDance Seed, supporting both text and visual understanding. It features a 256k context window and can generate outputs of...

Frequently asked questions

o1 vs Seed 1.6 Flash — which is cheaper?

Seed 1.6 Flash is cheaper on output ($0.3/M vs $60/M).

Which has the larger context window?

Seed 1.6 Flash offers the larger context window (262K tokens).

o1 vs Seed 1.6 Flash — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Seed 1.6 Flash for the lower output price ($0.3/M vs $60/M). It also gives you the larger 262K context window.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →