o1 Paid vs RERelace Apply 3 Paid
o1 vs Relace Apply 3 compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.
o1 — full profile › · Relace Apply 3 — full profile ›
Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai
Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.
$60 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
$1.25 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
o1 vs Relace Apply 3 specs
| Spec | o1 | Relace Apply 3 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maker | OpenAI | Relace | – |
| Type | Proprietary | Proprietary | – |
| Context window | 200K tokens | 256K tokens | RERelace Apply 3 |
| Input price | $15/M | $0.85/M | RERelace Apply 3 |
| Output price | $60/M | $1.25/M | RERelace Apply 3 |
| Vision / multimodal | Yes | No | |
| Tool / function calling | Yes | No | |
| Self-hostable | No (API only) | No (API only) | – |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary | – |
Price gap & when to choose each
Relace Apply 3 is ~48× cheaper than o1 on output tokens ($1.25 vs $60 per M tokens).
- You want frontier performance through a managed API
- You value reliability & ecosystem
- You don't want to manage infrastructure
- You want frontier performance through a managed API
- You need the longer 256K context window
- You want the lower output price
- You value reliability & ecosystem
- You don't want to manage infrastructure
Feature comparison
| Capability | o1 | Relace Apply 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Open weights (downloadable) | ✗ | ✗ |
| Self-hostable | ✗ | ✗ |
| Runs fully offline | ✗ | ✗ |
| Vision / multimodal | ✓ | ✗ |
| Tool / function calling | ✓ | ✗ |
| 1M+ context window | ✗ | ✗ |
Benchmarks: o1 vs Relace Apply 3
Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).
Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.
How o1 and Relace Apply 3 score
| Criterion | o1 | Relace Apply 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost-efficiency | 2.0 | 4.5 |
| Context window | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Openness | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Self-hosting | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Multimodality | 5.0 | 2.0 |
Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.
What each model is
o1 Paid
The latest and strongest model family from OpenAI, o1 is designed to spend more time thinking before responding. The o1 model series is trained with large-scale reinforcement learning to reason...
Relace Apply 3 Paid
Relace Apply 3 is a specialized code-patching LLM that merges AI-suggested edits straight into your source files. It can apply updates from GPT-4o, Claude, and others into your files at...
Frequently asked questions
o1 vs Relace Apply 3 — which is cheaper?
Relace Apply 3 is cheaper on output ($1.25/M vs $60/M).
Which has the larger context window?
Relace Apply 3 offers the larger context window (256K tokens).
o1 vs Relace Apply 3 — which should I pick in 2026?
Choose Relace Apply 3 for the lower output price ($1.25/M vs $60/M). It also gives you the larger 256K context window.
People also compare
Explore more open-source AI
Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.
Open the leaderboard →