AI Models · Paid vs Paid

o1 Paid vs WRPalmyra X5 Paid

o1 vs Palmyra X5 compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

o1 — full profile › · Palmyra X5 — full profile ›

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

o1PaidOpenAI

$15 /M input
$60 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)

TypeProprietary

Context window200K tokens

MultimodalYes

Self-hostNo

WRPalmyra X5PaidWriter

$0.6 /M input
$6 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)

TypeProprietary

Context window1M tokens

MultimodalNo

Self-hostNo

Choose Palmyra X5 for the lower output price ($6/M vs $60/M). It also gives you the larger 1M context window.

o1 vs Palmyra X5 specs

Spec	o1	Palmyra X5	Winner
Maker	OpenAI	Writer	–
Type	Proprietary	Proprietary	–
Context window	200K tokens	1M tokens	WRPalmyra X5
Input price	$15/M	$0.6/M	WRPalmyra X5
Output price	$60/M	$6/M	WRPalmyra X5
Vision / multimodal	Yes	No	o1
Tool / function calling	Yes	No	o1
Self-hostable	No (API only)	No (API only)	–
License	Proprietary	Proprietary	–

Price gap & when to choose each

10×cheaper per output token

Palmyra X5 is ~10× cheaper than o1 on output tokens ($6 vs $60 per M tokens).

Choose o1 if…

You want frontier performance through a managed API
You value reliability & ecosystem
You don't want to manage infrastructure

WRChoose Palmyra X5 if…

You want frontier performance through a managed API
You need the longer 1M context window
You want the lower output price
You value reliability & ecosystem
You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

Capability	o1	Palmyra X5
Open weights (downloadable)	✗	✗
Self-hostable	✗	✗
Runs fully offline	✗	✗
Vision / multimodal	✓	✗
Tool / function calling	✓	✗
1M+ context window	✗	✓

Benchmarks: o1 vs Palmyra X5

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

Palmyra X5

Intelligence index

15.2

–

Coding index

39.7

–

GPQA

74.7%

–

MMLU-Pro

84.1%

–

Humanity's Last Exam

–

Long Context Reasoning

65%

–

LiveCodeBench

67.9%

–

MATH-500

97%

–

AIME

72.3%

–

IFBench

70.3%

–

τ²-Bench

62.6%

–

Terminal-Bench Hard

12.9%

–

Speed

0 tok/s

–

Latency

–

Intelligence per $

0.6

–

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How o1 and Palmyra X5 score

🤝 Neck and neck on these criteria (2.7 vs 2.7 / 5).

Criterion	o1	Palmyra X5
Cost-efficiency	2.0	4.0
Context window	4.0	5.0
Openness	1.5	1.5
Self-hosting	1.0	1.0
Multimodality	5.0	2.0

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

o1 Paid

OpenAI · Proprietary

The latest and strongest model family from OpenAI, o1 is designed to spend more time thinking before responding. The o1 model series is trained with large-scale reinforcement learning to reason...

Palmyra X5 Paid

Writer · Proprietary

Palmyra X5 is Writer's most advanced model, purpose-built for building and scaling AI agents across the enterprise. It delivers industry-leading speed and efficiency on context windows up to 1 million...

Frequently asked questions

o1 vs Palmyra X5 — which is cheaper?

Palmyra X5 is cheaper on output ($6/M vs $60/M).

Which has the larger context window?

Palmyra X5 offers the larger context window (1M tokens).

o1 vs Palmyra X5 — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Palmyra X5 for the lower output price ($6/M vs $60/M). It also gives you the larger 1M context window.

People also compare

Hy3 vs o1 Hy3 vs Palmyra X5 GLM 5.3 vs o1 GLM 5.3 vs Palmyra X5 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs o1 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Palmyra X5

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →