AI Models · Paid vs Paid

o1 Paid vs o4 Mini Paid

o1 vs o4 Mini compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

o1PaidOpenAI
$15 /M input
$60 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window200K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
o4 MiniPaidOpenAI
$1.1 /M input
$4.4 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window200K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Choose o4 Mini for the lower output price ($4.4/M vs $60/M). Choose o1 if you need the larger 200K context window.

o1 vs o4 Mini specs

Speco1o4 MiniWinner
MakerOpenAIOpenAI
TypeProprietaryProprietary
Context window200K tokens200K tokens= Tie
Input price$15/M$1.1/Mo4 Mini
Output price$60/M$4.4/Mo4 Mini
Vision / multimodalYesYes= Tie
Tool / function callingYesYes= Tie
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)
LicenseProprietaryProprietary

Price gap & when to choose each

14×cheaper per output token

o4 Mini is ~14× cheaper than o1 on output tokens ($4.4 vs $60 per M tokens).

Choose o1 if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure
Choose o4 Mini if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You want the lower output price
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

Capabilityo1o4 Mini
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

Benchmarks: o1 vs o4 Mini

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

o4 Mini delivers 15× more intelligence per dollar.
o1
o4 Mini
Intelligence index
15.2
16.7
Coding index
39.7
GPQA
74.7%
78.4%
MMLU-Pro
84.1%
83.2%
Humanity's Last Exam
7%
16.5%
Long Context Reasoning
65%
61%
LiveCodeBench
67.9%
85.9%
MATH-500
97%
98.9%
AIME
72.3%
94%
IFBench
70.3%
68.7%
τ²-Bench
62.6%
55.6%
Terminal-Bench Hard
12.9%
15.2%
Math index
90.7
AIME 2025
90.7%
Speed
0 tok/s
0 tok/s
Latency
0s
0s
Intelligence per $
0.6
8.7

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How o1 and o4 Mini score

🏆 Best value & openness: o4 Mini (3.1 vs 2.7 / 5)
Criteriono1o4 Mini
Cost-efficiency2.04.0
Context window4.04.0
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality5.05.0

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

o1 Paid

OpenAI · Proprietary

The latest and strongest model family from OpenAI, o1 is designed to spend more time thinking before responding. The o1 model series is trained with large-scale reinforcement learning to reason...

o4 Mini Paid

OpenAI · Proprietary

OpenAI o4-mini is a compact reasoning model in the o-series, optimized for fast, cost-efficient performance while retaining strong multimodal and agentic capabilities. It supports tool use and demonstrates competitive reasoning...

Other models in these families

These variants are tracked but not compared here — one page per family keeps the comparison readable.

Other variants tracked
o4 Mini Higho4 Mini (batch)

Frequently asked questions

o1 vs o4 Mini — which is cheaper?

o4 Mini is cheaper on output ($4.4/M vs $60/M).

Which has the larger context window?

o1 offers the larger context window (200K tokens).

o1 vs o4 Mini — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose o4 Mini for the lower output price ($4.4/M vs $60/M). Choose o1 if you need the larger 200K context window.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →