AI Models · Paid vs Paid

o1 Paid vs GPT-5 Nano Paid

o1 vs GPT-5 Nano compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

o1PaidOpenAI
$15 /M input
$60 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window200K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
GPT-5 NanoPaidOpenAI
$0.05 /M input
$0.4 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window400K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Choose GPT-5 Nano for the lower output price ($0.4/M vs $60/M). It also gives you the larger 400K context window.

o1 vs GPT-5 Nano specs

Speco1GPT-5 NanoWinner
MakerOpenAIOpenAI
TypeProprietaryProprietary
Context window200K tokens400K tokensGPT-5 Nano
Input price$15/M$0.05/MGPT-5 Nano
Output price$60/M$0.4/MGPT-5 Nano
Vision / multimodalYesYes= Tie
Tool / function callingYesYes= Tie
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)
LicenseProprietaryProprietary

Price gap & when to choose each

150×cheaper per output token

GPT-5 Nano is ~150× cheaper than o1 on output tokens ($0.4 vs $60 per M tokens).

Choose o1 if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure
Choose GPT-5 Nano if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You need the longer 400K context window
  • You want the lower output price
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

Capabilityo1GPT-5 Nano
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

Benchmarks: o1 vs GPT-5 Nano

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

GPT-5 Nano delivers 157× more intelligence per dollar.
o1
GPT-5 Nano
Intelligence index
15.2
13
Coding index
39.7
GPQA
74.7%
67.6%
MMLU-Pro
84.1%
78%
Humanity's Last Exam
7%
9.5%
Long Context Reasoning
65%
45%
LiveCodeBench
67.9%
78.9%
MATH-500
97%
AIME
72.3%
IFBench
70.3%
67.6%
τ²-Bench
62.6%
36.5%
Terminal-Bench Hard
12.9%
12.1%
Math index
83.7
AIME 2025
83.7%
Speed
0 tok/s
0 tok/s
Latency
0s
0s
Intelligence per $
0.6
94.2

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How o1 and GPT-5 Nano score

🏆 Best value & openness: GPT-5 Nano (3.4 vs 2.7 / 5)
Criteriono1GPT-5 Nano
Cost-efficiency2.05.0
Context window4.04.5
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality5.05.0

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

o1 Paid

OpenAI · Proprietary

The latest and strongest model family from OpenAI, o1 is designed to spend more time thinking before responding. The o1 model series is trained with large-scale reinforcement learning to reason...

GPT-5 Nano Paid

OpenAI · Proprietary

GPT-5-Nano is the smallest and fastest variant in the GPT-5 system, optimized for developer tools, rapid interactions, and ultra-low latency environments. While limited in reasoning depth compared to its larger...

Other models in these families

These variants are tracked but not compared here — one page per family keeps the comparison readable.

Other variants tracked
GPT-5.4 NanoGPT-5.4 Nano (batch)GPT-5 Nano (batch)

Frequently asked questions

o1 vs GPT-5 Nano — which is cheaper?

GPT-5 Nano is cheaper on output ($0.4/M vs $60/M).

Which has the larger context window?

GPT-5 Nano offers the larger context window (400K tokens).

o1 vs GPT-5 Nano — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose GPT-5 Nano for the lower output price ($0.4/M vs $60/M). It also gives you the larger 400K context window.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →