o1 Paid vs GPT-5.6 Luna Paid
o1 vs GPT-5.6 Luna compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.
o1 — full profile › · GPT-5.6 Luna — full profile ›
Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai
Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.
$60 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
$1.2 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
o1 vs GPT-5.6 Luna specs
| Spec | o1 | GPT-5.6 Luna | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maker | OpenAI | OpenAI | – |
| Type | Proprietary | Proprietary | – |
| Context window | 200K tokens | 1.1M tokens | |
| Input price | $15/M | $0.2/M | |
| Output price | $60/M | $1.2/M | |
| Vision / multimodal | Yes | Yes | = Tie |
| Tool / function calling | Yes | Yes | = Tie |
| Self-hostable | No (API only) | No (API only) | – |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary | – |
Price gap & when to choose each
GPT-5.6 Luna is ~50× cheaper than o1 on output tokens ($1.2 vs $60 per M tokens).
- You want frontier performance through a managed API
- You value reliability & ecosystem
- You don't want to manage infrastructure
- You want frontier performance through a managed API
- You need the longer 1.1M context window
- You want the lower output price
- You value reliability & ecosystem
- You don't want to manage infrastructure
Feature comparison
| Capability | o1 | GPT-5.6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| Open weights (downloadable) | ✗ | ✗ |
| Self-hostable | ✗ | ✗ |
| Runs fully offline | ✗ | ✗ |
| Vision / multimodal | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tool / function calling | ✓ | ✓ |
| 1M+ context window | ✗ | ✓ |
Benchmarks: o1 vs GPT-5.6 Luna
Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).
Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.
How o1 and GPT-5.6 Luna score
| Criterion | o1 | GPT-5.6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| Cost-efficiency | 2.0 | 4.5 |
| Context window | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| Openness | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Self-hosting | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Multimodality | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.
What each model is
o1 Paid
The latest and strongest model family from OpenAI, o1 is designed to spend more time thinking before responding. The o1 model series is trained with large-scale reinforcement learning to reason...
GPT-5.6 Luna Paid
GPT-5.6 Luna is a fast, cost-efficient model in OpenAI's GPT-5.6 series. It is suited for high-volume, latency-sensitive tasks such as chat, classification, and lightweight agentic workflows, providing capable reasoning for...
Frequently asked questions
o1 vs GPT-5.6 Luna — which is cheaper?
GPT-5.6 Luna is cheaper on output ($1.2/M vs $60/M).
Which has the larger context window?
GPT-5.6 Luna offers the larger context window (1.1M tokens).
o1 vs GPT-5.6 Luna — which should I pick in 2026?
Choose GPT-5.6 Luna for the lower output price ($1.2/M vs $60/M). It also gives you the larger 1.1M context window.
People also compare
Explore more open-source AI
Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.
Open the leaderboard →