o1 Paid vs 
Codestral 2508 Paid
o1 vs Codestral 2508 compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.
o1 — full profile › · Codestral 2508 — full profile ›
Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai
Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.
$60 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
$0.9 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
o1 vs Codestral 2508 specs
| Spec | o1 | Codestral 2508 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maker | OpenAI | Mistral AI | – |
| Type | Proprietary | Proprietary | – |
| Context window | 200K tokens | 256K tokens | |
| Input price | $15/M | $0.3/M | |
| Output price | $60/M | $0.9/M | |
| Vision / multimodal | Yes | No | |
| Tool / function calling | Yes | Yes | = Tie |
| Self-hostable | No (API only) | No (API only) | – |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary | – |
Price gap & when to choose each
Codestral 2508 is ~67× cheaper than o1 on output tokens ($0.9 vs $60 per M tokens).
- You want frontier performance through a managed API
- You value reliability & ecosystem
- You don't want to manage infrastructure
- You want frontier performance through a managed API
- You need the longer 256K context window
- You want the lower output price
- You value reliability & ecosystem
- You don't want to manage infrastructure
Feature comparison
| Capability | o1 | Codestral 2508 |
|---|---|---|
| Open weights (downloadable) | ✗ | ✗ |
| Self-hostable | ✗ | ✗ |
| Runs fully offline | ✗ | ✗ |
| Vision / multimodal | ✓ | ✗ |
| Tool / function calling | ✓ | ✓ |
| 1M+ context window | ✗ | ✗ |
Benchmarks: o1 vs Codestral 2508
Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).
Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.
How o1 and Codestral 2508 score
| Criterion | o1 | Codestral 2508 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost-efficiency | 2.0 | 5.0 |
| Context window | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Openness | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Self-hosting | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Multimodality | 5.0 | 3.5 |
Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.
What each model is
o1 Paid
The latest and strongest model family from OpenAI, o1 is designed to spend more time thinking before responding. The o1 model series is trained with large-scale reinforcement learning to reason...
Codestral 2508 Paid
Mistral's cutting-edge language model for coding released end of July 2025. Codestral specializes in low-latency, high-frequency tasks such as fill-in-the-middle (FIM), code correction and test generation. [Blog Post](https://mistral.ai/ne
Frequently asked questions
o1 vs Codestral 2508 — which is cheaper?
Codestral 2508 is cheaper on output ($0.9/M vs $60/M).
Which has the larger context window?
Codestral 2508 offers the larger context window (256K tokens).
o1 vs Codestral 2508 — which should I pick in 2026?
Choose Codestral 2508 for the lower output price ($0.9/M vs $60/M). It also gives you the larger 256K context window.
People also compare
Explore more open-source AI
Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.
Open the leaderboard →