AI Models · Paid vs Paid

o1 Paid vs Claude Fable 5.1 Paid

o1 vs Claude Fable 5.1 compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

o1PaidOpenAI
$15 /M input
$60 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window200K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Claude Fable 5.1PaidAnthropic
$10 /M input
$50 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window1M tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Choose Claude Fable 5.1 for the lower output price ($50/M vs $60/M). It also gives you the larger 1M context window.

o1 vs Claude Fable 5.1 specs

Speco1Claude Fable 5.1Winner
MakerOpenAIAnthropic
TypeProprietaryProprietary
Context window200K tokens1M tokensClaude Fable 5.1
Input price$15/M$10/MClaude Fable 5.1
Output price$60/M$50/MClaude Fable 5.1
Vision / multimodalYesYes= Tie
Tool / function callingYesYes= Tie
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)
LicenseProprietaryProprietary

Price gap & when to choose each

Choose o1 if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure
Choose Claude Fable 5.1 if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You need the longer 1M context window
  • You want the lower output price
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

Capabilityo1Claude Fable 5.1
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

Benchmarks: o1 vs Claude Fable 5.1

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

Claude Fable 5.1 delivers 4.5× more intelligence per dollar.
o1
Claude Fable 5.1
Intelligence index
15.2
53.4
Coding index
39.7
81.6
GPQA
74.7%
93.7%
MMLU-Pro
84.1%
Humanity's Last Exam
7%
59.1%
Long Context Reasoning
65%
85.3%
LiveCodeBench
67.9%
MATH-500
97%
AIME
72.3%
IFBench
70.3%
τ²-Bench
62.6%
Terminal-Bench Hard
12.9%
SciCode
63.1%
τ-Bench Banking
47.2%
Terminal-Bench
91.4%
Speed
0 tok/s
66.7 tok/s
Latency
0s
137.76s
Intelligence per $
0.6
2.7

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How o1 and Claude Fable 5.1 score

🤝 Neck and neck on these criteria (2.7 vs 2.9 / 5).
Criteriono1Claude Fable 5.1
Cost-efficiency2.02.0
Context window4.05.0
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality5.05.0

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

o1 Paid

OpenAI · Proprietary

The latest and strongest model family from OpenAI, o1 is designed to spend more time thinking before responding. The o1 model series is trained with large-scale reinforcement learning to reason...

Claude Fable 5.1 Paid

Anthropic · Proprietary

Claude Fable 5.1 improves on Claude Fable 5 across the board, with the biggest gains in agentic coding, long-running agentic workflows, and knowledge work: long code refactors, front-end and visual...

Frequently asked questions

o1 vs Claude Fable 5.1 — which is cheaper?

Claude Fable 5.1 is cheaper on output ($50/M vs $60/M).

Which has the larger context window?

Claude Fable 5.1 offers the larger context window (1M tokens).

o1 vs Claude Fable 5.1 — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Claude Fable 5.1 for the lower output price ($50/M vs $60/M). It also gives you the larger 1M context window.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →