AI Models · Paid vs Paid

o1 Paid vs AIAion-2.0 Paid

o1 vs Aion-2.0 compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

o1PaidOpenAI
$15 /M input
$60 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window200K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
AIAion-2.0PaidAionLabs
$0.8 /M input
$1.6 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window131K tokens
MultimodalNo
Self-hostNo
Choose Aion-2.0 for the lower output price ($1.6/M vs $60/M). Choose o1 if you need the larger 200K context window.

o1 vs Aion-2.0 specs

Speco1Aion-2.0Winner
MakerOpenAIAionLabs
TypeProprietaryProprietary
Context window200K tokens131K tokenso1
Input price$15/M$0.8/MAIAion-2.0
Output price$60/M$1.6/MAIAion-2.0
Vision / multimodalYesNoo1
Tool / function callingYesYes= Tie
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)
LicenseProprietaryProprietary

Price gap & when to choose each

38×cheaper per output token

Aion-2.0 is ~38× cheaper than o1 on output tokens ($1.6 vs $60 per M tokens).

Choose o1 if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You need the longer 200K context window
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure
AIChoose Aion-2.0 if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You want the lower output price
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

Capabilityo1Aion-2.0
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

Benchmarks: o1 vs Aion-2.0

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

o1
Aion-2.0
Intelligence index
15.2
Coding index
39.7
GPQA
74.7%
MMLU-Pro
84.1%
Humanity's Last Exam
7%
Long Context Reasoning
65%
LiveCodeBench
67.9%
MATH-500
97%
AIME
72.3%
IFBench
70.3%
τ²-Bench
62.6%
Terminal-Bench Hard
12.9%
Speed
0 tok/s
Latency
0s
Intelligence per $
0.6

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How o1 and Aion-2.0 score

🤝 Neck and neck on these criteria (2.7 vs 2.8 / 5).
Criteriono1Aion-2.0
Cost-efficiency2.04.5
Context window4.03.5
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality5.03.5

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

o1 Paid

OpenAI · Proprietary

The latest and strongest model family from OpenAI, o1 is designed to spend more time thinking before responding. The o1 model series is trained with large-scale reinforcement learning to reason...

Aion-2.0 Paid

AionLabs · Proprietary

Aion-2.0 is a variant of DeepSeek V3.2 optimized for immersive roleplaying and storytelling. It is particularly strong at introducing tension, crises, and conflict into stories, making narratives feel more engaging....

Frequently asked questions

o1 vs Aion-2.0 — which is cheaper?

Aion-2.0 is cheaper on output ($1.6/M vs $60/M).

Which has the larger context window?

o1 offers the larger context window (200K tokens).

o1 vs Aion-2.0 — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Aion-2.0 for the lower output price ($1.6/M vs $60/M). Choose o1 if you need the larger 200K context window.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →