AI Models · Paid vs Paid

AMNova Premier 1.0 Paid vs Claude Sonnet 5 Paid

Nova Premier 1.0 vs Claude Sonnet 5 compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

AMNova Premier 1.0PaidAmazon
$2.5 /M input
$12.5 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window1M tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Claude Sonnet 5PaidAnthropic
$2 /M input
$10 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window1M tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Choose Claude Sonnet 5 for the lower output price ($10/M vs $12.5/M). Choose Nova Premier 1.0 if you need the larger 1M context window.

Nova Premier 1.0 vs Claude Sonnet 5 specs

SpecNova Premier 1.0Claude Sonnet 5Winner
MakerAmazonAnthropic
TypeProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M tokens1M tokens= Tie
Input price$2.5/M$2/MClaude Sonnet 5
Output price$12.5/M$10/MClaude Sonnet 5
Vision / multimodalYesYes= Tie
Tool / function callingYesYes= Tie
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)
LicenseProprietaryProprietary

Price gap & when to choose each

AMChoose Nova Premier 1.0 if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure
Choose Claude Sonnet 5 if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You want the lower output price
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

CapabilityNova Premier 1.0Claude Sonnet 5
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

Benchmarks: Nova Premier 1.0 vs Claude Sonnet 5

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

Nova Premier 1.0
Claude Sonnet 5
Intelligence index
38.4
Coding index
71.5
GPQA
91.1%
Humanity's Last Exam
41.3%
Long Context Reasoning
82%
SciCode
54.3%
τ-Bench Banking
37.3%
Terminal-Bench
80.5%
Speed
83.2 tok/s
Latency
114.22s
Intelligence per $
9.6

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How Nova Premier 1.0 and Claude Sonnet 5 score

🤝 Neck and neck on these criteria (3.2 vs 3.2 / 5).
CriterionNova Premier 1.0Claude Sonnet 5
Cost-efficiency3.53.5
Context window5.05.0
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality5.05.0

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

Nova Premier 1.0 Paid

Amazon · Proprietary

Amazon Nova Premier is the most capable of Amazon’s multimodal models for complex reasoning tasks and for use as the best teacher for distilling custom models.

Claude Sonnet 5 Paid

Anthropic · Proprietary

Sonnet 5 is Anthropic's most capable Sonnet-class model, with frontier performance across coding, agents, and professional work. It supports adaptive thinking with selectable reasoning effort levels (low, medium, high, max,...

Other models in these families

These variants are tracked but not compared here — one page per family keeps the comparison readable.

Other variants tracked
Claude Sonnet 5 (batch)Claude Sonnet 4.6Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch)Claude Sonnet 4.5Claude Sonnet 4.5 (batch)Claude Sonnet 4

Frequently asked questions

Nova Premier 1.0 vs Claude Sonnet 5 — which is cheaper?

Claude Sonnet 5 is cheaper on output ($10/M vs $12.5/M).

Which has the larger context window?

Nova Premier 1.0 offers the larger context window (1M tokens).

Nova Premier 1.0 vs Claude Sonnet 5 — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Claude Sonnet 5 for the lower output price ($10/M vs $12.5/M). Choose Nova Premier 1.0 if you need the larger 1M context window.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →