Mistral Medium 3.5 Open vs AMNova Micro 1.0 Paid
Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Nova Micro 1.0 compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Can the open-source model replace the paid one? Full 2026 breakdown.
Nova Micro 1.0 — full profile ›
Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai
Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.
$7.5 /M outputNo per-token fees if you self-host
$0.14 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Nova Micro 1.0 specs
| Spec | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Nova Micro 1.0 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maker | Mistral AI | Amazon | – |
| Type | Open-weight | Proprietary | |
| Context window | 262K tokens | 128K tokens | |
| Input price | $1.5/M · free self-host | $0.04/M | AMNova Micro 1.0 |
| Output price | $7.5/M · free self-host | $0.14/M | AMNova Micro 1.0 |
| Vision / multimodal | Yes | No | |
| Tool / function calling | Yes | Yes | = Tie |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No (API only) | |
| License | Apache 2.0 | Proprietary |
Price gap & when to choose each
Nova Micro 1.0 is ~54× cheaper than Mistral Medium 3.5 on output tokens ($0.14 vs $7.5 per M tokens).
- You want to self-host or run on your cloud
- You need the longer 262K context window
- You prioritize data privacy & control
- You are building open or reproducible AI
- You want frontier performance through a managed API
- You want the lower output price
- You value reliability & ecosystem
- You don't want to manage infrastructure
Feature comparison
| Capability | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Nova Micro 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Open weights (downloadable) | ✓ | ✗ |
| Self-hostable | ✓ | ✗ |
| Runs fully offline | ✓ | ✗ |
| Vision / multimodal | ✓ | ✗ |
| Tool / function calling | ✓ | ✓ |
| 1M+ context window | ✗ | ✗ |
Benchmarks: Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Nova Micro 1.0
Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).
Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.
How Mistral Medium 3.5 and Nova Micro 1.0 score
| Criterion | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Nova Micro 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost-efficiency | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| Context window | 4.0 | 3.5 |
| Openness | 5.0 | 1.5 |
| Self-hosting | 5.0 | 1.0 |
| Multimodality | 5.0 | 3.5 |
Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.
What each model is
Mistral Medium 3.5 Open
Mistral Medium 3.5 is a dense 128B instruction-following model from Mistral AI. It supports text and image inputs with text output, and is designed for agentic workflows, coding, and complex...
Nova Micro 1.0 Paid
Amazon Nova Micro 1.0 is a text-only model that delivers the lowest latency responses in the Amazon Nova family of models at a very low cost. With a context length...
Other models in these families
These variants are tracked but not compared here — one page per family keeps the comparison readable.
Frequently asked questions
Is Mistral Medium 3.5 as good as Nova Micro 1.0?
Mistral Medium 3.5 is open-weight and competitive on many tasks, but Nova Micro 1.0 may still lead on the hardest reasoning and agentic work. The gap keeps narrowing — benchmark both on your actual use case before deciding.
Can I run Mistral Medium 3.5 locally?
Yes. Mistral Medium 3.5 has open weights, so you can self-host it on your own GPUs or run it via a low-cost API. Nova Micro 1.0 is API-only and cannot be self-hosted.
Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Nova Micro 1.0 — which should I pick in 2026?
Choose Mistral Medium 3.5 if you want to self-host, keep your data private and skip per-token fees — it's open-weight and runs on your own hardware. Choose Nova Micro 1.0 if you want frontier capability through a managed API with zero infrastructure to run.
People also compare
Explore more open-source AI
Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.
Open the leaderboard →