Mistral Large 2407 Paid vs 
Seed 1.6 Flash Paid
Mistral Large 2407 vs Seed 1.6 Flash compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.
Mistral Large 2407 — full profile › · Seed 1.6 Flash — full profile ›
Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai
Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.
$6 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
$0.3 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
Mistral Large 2407 vs Seed 1.6 Flash specs
| Spec | Mistral Large 2407 | Seed 1.6 Flash | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maker | Mistral AI | ByteDance Seed | – |
| Type | Proprietary | Proprietary | – |
| Context window | 131K tokens | 262K tokens | |
| Input price | $2/M | $0.08/M | |
| Output price | $6/M | $0.3/M | |
| Vision / multimodal | No | Yes | |
| Tool / function calling | Yes | Yes | = Tie |
| Self-hostable | No (API only) | No (API only) | – |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary | – |
Price gap & when to choose each
Seed 1.6 Flash is ~20× cheaper than Mistral Large 2407 on output tokens ($0.3 vs $6 per M tokens).
- You want frontier performance through a managed API
- You value reliability & ecosystem
- You don't want to manage infrastructure
- You want frontier performance through a managed API
- You need the longer 262K context window
- You want the lower output price
- You value reliability & ecosystem
- You don't want to manage infrastructure
Feature comparison
| Capability | Mistral Large 2407 | Seed 1.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Open weights (downloadable) | ✗ | ✗ |
| Self-hostable | ✗ | ✗ |
| Runs fully offline | ✗ | ✗ |
| Vision / multimodal | ✗ | ✓ |
| Tool / function calling | ✓ | ✓ |
| 1M+ context window | ✗ | ✗ |
Benchmarks: Mistral Large 2407 vs Seed 1.6 Flash
Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).
Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.
How Mistral Large 2407 and Seed 1.6 Flash score
| Criterion | Mistral Large 2407 | Seed 1.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Cost-efficiency | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| Context window | 3.5 | 4.0 |
| Openness | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Self-hosting | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Multimodality | 3.5 | 5.0 |
Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.
What each model is
Mistral Large 2407 Paid
This is Mistral AI's flagship model, Mistral Large 2 (version mistral-large-2407). It's a proprietary weights-available model and excels at reasoning, code, JSON, chat, and more. Read the launch announcement [here](https://mistral.ai/news/m
Seed 1.6 Flash Paid
Seed 1.6 Flash is an ultra-fast multimodal deep thinking model by ByteDance Seed, supporting both text and visual understanding. It features a 256k context window and can generate outputs of...
Frequently asked questions
Mistral Large 2407 vs Seed 1.6 Flash — which is cheaper?
Seed 1.6 Flash is cheaper on output ($0.3/M vs $6/M).
Which has the larger context window?
Seed 1.6 Flash offers the larger context window (262K tokens).
Mistral Large 2407 vs Seed 1.6 Flash — which should I pick in 2026?
Choose Seed 1.6 Flash for the lower output price ($0.3/M vs $6/M). It also gives you the larger 262K context window.
People also compare
Explore more open-source AI
Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.
Open the leaderboard →