Mistral Large 2407 Paid vs RERelace Search Paid
Mistral Large 2407 vs Relace Search compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.
Mistral Large 2407 — full profile › · Relace Search — full profile ›
Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai
Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.
$6 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
$3 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
Mistral Large 2407 vs Relace Search specs
| Spec | Mistral Large 2407 | Relace Search | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maker | Mistral AI | Relace | – |
| Type | Proprietary | Proprietary | – |
| Context window | 131K tokens | 256K tokens | RERelace Search |
| Input price | $2/M | $1/M | RERelace Search |
| Output price | $6/M | $3/M | RERelace Search |
| Vision / multimodal | No | No | – |
| Tool / function calling | Yes | Yes | = Tie |
| Self-hostable | No (API only) | No (API only) | – |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary | – |
Price gap & when to choose each
Relace Search is ~2.0× cheaper than Mistral Large 2407 on output tokens ($3 vs $6 per M tokens).
- You want frontier performance through a managed API
- You value reliability & ecosystem
- You don't want to manage infrastructure
- You want frontier performance through a managed API
- You need the longer 256K context window
- You want the lower output price
- You value reliability & ecosystem
- You don't want to manage infrastructure
Feature comparison
| Capability | Mistral Large 2407 | Relace Search |
|---|---|---|
| Open weights (downloadable) | ✗ | ✗ |
| Self-hostable | ✗ | ✗ |
| Runs fully offline | ✗ | ✗ |
| Vision / multimodal | ✗ | ✗ |
| Tool / function calling | ✓ | ✓ |
| 1M+ context window | ✗ | ✗ |
Benchmarks: Mistral Large 2407 vs Relace Search
Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).
Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.
How Mistral Large 2407 and Relace Search score
| Criterion | Mistral Large 2407 | Relace Search |
|---|---|---|
| Cost-efficiency | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Context window | 3.5 | 4.0 |
| Openness | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Self-hosting | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Multimodality | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.
What each model is
Mistral Large 2407 Paid
This is Mistral AI's flagship model, Mistral Large 2 (version mistral-large-2407). It's a proprietary weights-available model and excels at reasoning, code, JSON, chat, and more. Read the launch announcement [here](https://mistral.ai/news/m
Relace Search Paid
The relace-search model uses 4-12 `view_file` and `grep` tools in parallel to explore a codebase and return relevant files to the user request. In contrast to RAG, relace-search performs agentic...
Frequently asked questions
Mistral Large 2407 vs Relace Search — which is cheaper?
Relace Search is cheaper on output ($3/M vs $6/M).
Which has the larger context window?
Relace Search offers the larger context window (256K tokens).
Mistral Large 2407 vs Relace Search — which should I pick in 2026?
Choose Relace Search for the lower output price ($3/M vs $6/M). It also gives you the larger 256K context window.
People also compare
Explore more open-source AI
Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.
Open the leaderboard →