MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Seed-2.0-Code compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Can the open-source model replace the paid one? Full 2026 breakdown.
Seed-2.0-Code — full profile ›
Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai
Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.
| Spec | MiniMax M3.1 Flash | Seed-2.0-Code | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maker | MiniMax | ByteDance Seed | – |
| Type | Open-weight | Proprietary | |
| Context window | 1M tokens | 262K tokens | |
| Input price | $0.15/M · free self-host | $0.5/M | |
| Output price | $0.6/M · free self-host | $3/M | |
| Vision / multimodal | Yes | Yes | = Tie |
| Tool / function calling | Yes | Yes | = Tie |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No (API only) | |
| License | MIT | Proprietary |
MiniMax M3.1 Flash is ~5.0× cheaper than Seed-2.0-Code on output tokens ($0.6 vs $3 per M tokens).
| Capability | MiniMax M3.1 Flash | Seed-2.0-Code |
|---|---|---|
| Open weights (downloadable) | ✓ | ✗ |
| Self-hostable | ✓ | ✗ |
| Runs fully offline | ✓ | ✗ |
| Vision / multimodal | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tool / function calling | ✓ | ✓ |
| 1M+ context window | ✓ | ✗ |
Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).
Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.
| Criterion | MiniMax M3.1 Flash | Seed-2.0-Code |
|---|---|---|
| Cost-efficiency | 5.0 | 4.0 |
| Context window | 5.0 | 4.0 |
| Openness | 5.0 | 1.5 |
| Self-hosting | 5.0 | 1.0 |
| Multimodality | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is a multimodal model from MiniMax. Compared with M3, it delivers significant improvements across multiple benchmarks, particularly in complex agentic tasks, coding, and cybersecurity. It is built for complex,...
Seed 2.0 Code is a model from ByteDance Seed optimized for agentic coding. It is suited for frontend development, multilingual programming tasks, and coding-agent workflows in tools such as Claude...
These variants are tracked but not compared here — one page per family keeps the comparison readable.
MiniMax M3.1 Flash is open-weight and competitive on many tasks, but Seed-2.0-Code may still lead on the hardest reasoning and agentic work. The gap keeps narrowing — benchmark both on your actual use case before deciding.
Yes. MiniMax M3.1 Flash has open weights, so you can self-host it on your own GPUs or run it via a low-cost API. Seed-2.0-Code is API-only and cannot be self-hosted.
MiniMax M3.1 Flash costs $0.6/M output vs $3/M for Seed-2.0-Code — roughly 5x cheaper via API, and free if you self-host.
Choose MiniMax M3.1 Flash if you want to self-host, keep your data private and skip per-token fees — it's open-weight and runs on your own hardware. Choose Seed-2.0-Code if you want frontier capability through a managed API with zero infrastructure to run.
Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.
Open the leaderboard →