Llama 4 Maverick Open vs AMNova Micro 1.0 Paid
Llama 4 Maverick vs Nova Micro 1.0 compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Can the open-source model replace the paid one? Full 2026 breakdown.
Nova Micro 1.0 — full profile ›
Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai
Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.
$0.7 /M outputNo per-token fees if you self-host
$0.14 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
Llama 4 Maverick vs Nova Micro 1.0 specs
| Spec | Llama 4 Maverick | Nova Micro 1.0 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maker | Meta | Amazon | – |
| Type | Open-weight | Proprietary | |
| Context window | 1M tokens | 128K tokens | |
| Input price | $0.2/M · free self-host | $0.04/M | AMNova Micro 1.0 |
| Output price | $0.7/M · free self-host | $0.14/M | AMNova Micro 1.0 |
| Vision / multimodal | Yes | No | |
| Tool / function calling | Yes | Yes | = Tie |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No (API only) | |
| License | Llama Community | Proprietary |
Price gap & when to choose each
Nova Micro 1.0 is ~5.0× cheaper than Llama 4 Maverick on output tokens ($0.14 vs $0.7 per M tokens).
- You want to self-host or run on your cloud
- You need the longer 1M context window
- You prioritize data privacy & control
- You are building open or reproducible AI
- You want frontier performance through a managed API
- You want the lower output price
- You value reliability & ecosystem
- You don't want to manage infrastructure
Feature comparison
| Capability | Llama 4 Maverick | Nova Micro 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Open weights (downloadable) | ✓ | ✗ |
| Self-hostable | ✓ | ✗ |
| Runs fully offline | ✓ | ✗ |
| Vision / multimodal | ✓ | ✗ |
| Tool / function calling | ✓ | ✓ |
| 1M+ context window | ✓ | ✗ |
Benchmarks: Llama 4 Maverick vs Nova Micro 1.0
Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).
Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.
How Llama 4 Maverick and Nova Micro 1.0 score
| Criterion | Llama 4 Maverick | Nova Micro 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost-efficiency | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Context window | 5.0 | 3.5 |
| Openness | 5.0 | 1.5 |
| Self-hosting | 5.0 | 1.0 |
| Multimodality | 5.0 | 3.5 |
Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.
What each model is
Llama 4 Maverick Open
Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct (128E) is a high-capacity multimodal language model from Meta, built on a mixture-of-experts (MoE) architecture with 128 experts and 17 billion active parameters per forward...
Nova Micro 1.0 Paid
Amazon Nova Micro 1.0 is a text-only model that delivers the lowest latency responses in the Amazon Nova family of models at a very low cost. With a context length...
Other models in these families
These variants are tracked but not compared here — one page per family keeps the comparison readable.
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 4 Maverick as good as Nova Micro 1.0?
Llama 4 Maverick is open-weight and competitive on many tasks, but Nova Micro 1.0 may still lead on the hardest reasoning and agentic work. The gap keeps narrowing — benchmark both on your actual use case before deciding.
Can I run Llama 4 Maverick locally?
Yes. Llama 4 Maverick has open weights, so you can self-host it on your own GPUs or run it via a low-cost API. Nova Micro 1.0 is API-only and cannot be self-hosted.
Llama 4 Maverick vs Nova Micro 1.0 — which should I pick in 2026?
Choose Llama 4 Maverick if you want to self-host, keep your data private and skip per-token fees — it's open-weight and runs on your own hardware. Choose Nova Micro 1.0 if you want frontier capability through a managed API with zero infrastructure to run.
People also compare
Explore more open-source AI
Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.
Open the leaderboard →