AI Models · Open-Source vs Paid

Llama 4 Maverick Open vs GPT-5.6 Sol (batch) Paid

Llama 4 Maverick vs GPT-5.6 Sol (batch) compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Can the open-source model replace the paid one? Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

Llama 4 MaverickOpenMeta
$0.2 /M input
$0.7 /M outputNo per-token fees if you self-host
TypeOpen-weight
Context window1M tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostYes
GPT-5.6 Sol (batch)PaidOpenAI
$1 /M input
$5 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window1.1M tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Choose Llama 4 Maverick if you want to self-host, keep your data private and skip per-token fees — it's open-weight and runs on your own hardware. Choose GPT-5.6 Sol (batch) if you want frontier capability through a managed API with zero infrastructure to run.

Llama 4 Maverick vs GPT-5.6 Sol (batch) specs

SpecLlama 4 MaverickGPT-5.6 Sol (batch)Winner
MakerMetaOpenAI
TypeOpen-weightProprietaryLlama 4 Maverick
Context window1M tokens1.1M tokensGPT-5.6 Sol (batch)
Input price$0.2/M · free self-host$1/MLlama 4 Maverick
Output price$0.7/M · free self-host$5/MLlama 4 Maverick
Vision / multimodalYesYes= Tie
Tool / function callingYesYes= Tie
Self-hostableYesNo (API only)Llama 4 Maverick
LicenseLlama CommunityProprietaryLlama 4 Maverick

Price gap & when to choose each

7.1×cheaper per output token

Llama 4 Maverick is ~7.1× cheaper than GPT-5.6 Sol (batch) on output tokens ($0.7 vs $5 per M tokens).

Choose Llama 4 Maverick if…
  • You want to self-host or run on your cloud
  • You prioritize data privacy & control
  • You want the lowest operating costs
  • You are building open or reproducible AI
Choose GPT-5.6 Sol (batch) if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You need the longer 1.1M context window
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

CapabilityLlama 4 MaverickGPT-5.6 Sol (batch)
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

Benchmarks: Llama 4 Maverick vs GPT-5.6 Sol (batch)

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

Llama 4 Maverick delivers 3.7× more intelligence per dollar.
Llama 4 Maverick
GPT-5.6 Sol (batch)
Intelligence index
9.3
47.1
Coding index
16.3
77.4
Math index
19.3
GPQA
67.1%
94.1%
MMLU-Pro
80.9%
Humanity's Last Exam
4.9%
49.5%
Long Context Reasoning
50%
84%
LiveCodeBench
39.7%
SciCode
31.7%
57.1%
MATH-500
88.9%
AIME
39%
AIME 2025
19.3%
IFBench
43%
72.7%
τ²-Bench
17.8%
85.1%
τ-Bench Banking
3.7%
44.3%
Terminal-Bench
7.9%
88%
Terminal-Bench Hard
6.8%
65.9%
Speed
96.3 tok/s
68.7 tok/s
Latency
0.57s
124.83s
Intelligence per $
22
5.9

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How Llama 4 Maverick and GPT-5.6 Sol (batch) score

🏆 Best value & openness: Llama 4 Maverick (5.0 vs 3.3 / 5)
CriterionLlama 4 MaverickGPT-5.6 Sol (batch)
Cost-efficiency5.04.0
Context window5.05.0
Openness5.01.5
Self-hosting5.01.0
Multimodality5.05.0

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

Llama 4 Maverick Open

Meta · Open-weight

Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct (128E) is a high-capacity multimodal language model from Meta, built on a mixture-of-experts (MoE) architecture with 128 experts and 17 billion active parameters per forward...

GPT-5.6 Sol (batch) Paid

OpenAI · Proprietary

GPT-5.6 Sol is the flagship model in OpenAI's GPT-5.6 series. It is suited for complex reasoning, coding, and agentic workflows, and is particularly strong at command-line and multi-step coding tasks...

Other models in these families

These variants are tracked but not compared here — one page per family keeps the comparison readable.

Other variants tracked
R1 Distill Llama 70BLlama 3.3 70B InstructLlama 3.1 8B InstructLlama 3.1 70B InstructLlama 4 ScoutHermes 3 70B InstructLlama 3.2 3B InstructLlama 3.2 1B InstructAion-RP 1.0 (8B)Hermes 3 405B InstructLlama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2Llama 3.3 Euryale 70BLlama Guard 4 12BLlama 3 8B Lunaris
Other variants tracked
GPT-5.6 Terra (batch)GPT-5.4GPT-5.4 (batch)GPT-5.5GPT-5.5 (batch)GPT-5.6 Luna (batch)GPT-5.3-CodexGPT-5.2GPT-5.2 (batch)GPT-5.2-CodexGPT-5.1GPT-5.1 (batch)GPT-5.1-CodexGPT-5GPT-5 (batch)GPT-5.5 ProGPT-5.4 ProGPT-5.2 ProGPT-5 ProGPT-5.5 Pro (batch)GPT-5.4 Pro (batch)GPT-5.2 Pro (batch)GPT-5 Pro (batch)GPT-5.4 Image 2GPT-5.6 Terra ProGPT-5.6 Sol ProGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxGPT-5 ImageGPT-5.6 Terra Pro (batch)GPT-5.6 Sol Pro (batch)GPT-5.6 Luna ProGPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch)

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 4 Maverick as good as GPT-5.6 Sol (batch)?

Llama 4 Maverick is open-weight and competitive on many tasks, but GPT-5.6 Sol (batch) may still lead on the hardest reasoning and agentic work. The gap keeps narrowing — benchmark both on your actual use case before deciding.

Can I run Llama 4 Maverick locally?

Yes. Llama 4 Maverick has open weights, so you can self-host it on your own GPUs or run it via a low-cost API. GPT-5.6 Sol (batch) is API-only and cannot be self-hosted.

How much cheaper is Llama 4 Maverick?

Llama 4 Maverick costs $0.7/M output vs $5/M for GPT-5.6 Sol (batch) — roughly 7x cheaper via API, and free if you self-host.

Llama 4 Maverick vs GPT-5.6 Sol (batch) — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Llama 4 Maverick if you want to self-host, keep your data private and skip per-token fees — it's open-weight and runs on your own hardware. Choose GPT-5.6 Sol (batch) if you want frontier capability through a managed API with zero infrastructure to run.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →