AI Models · Open-Source vs Paid

Kimi K3 Open vs o4 Mini Paid

Kimi K3 vs o4 Mini compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Can the open-source model replace the paid one? Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

Choose Kimi K3 if you want to self-host, keep your data private and skip per-token fees — it's open-weight and runs on your own hardware. Choose o4 Mini if you want frontier capability through a managed API with zero infrastructure to run.

Kimi K3 vs o4 Mini specs

SpecKimi K3o4 Mini
MakerMoonshot AIOpenAI
TypeOpen-weightProprietary
Context window1M tokens200K tokens
Input price$3/M · free self-host$1.1/M
Output price$15/M · free self-host$4.4/M
Vision / multimodalYesYes
Tool / function callingYesYes
Self-hostableYesNo (API only)
LicenseModified MITProprietary

Feature comparison

CapabilityKimi K3o4 Mini
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

Benchmarks: Kimi K3 vs o4 Mini

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

Kimi K3
o4 Mini
Intelligence index
57.1
25.6
Coding index
76.2
GPQA
93.5%
78.4%
Humanity's Last Exam
44.3%
17.5%
Long Context Reasoning
74.7%
55%
SciCode
58.7%
46.5%
τ-Bench Banking
33.4%
Terminal-Bench
85%
Math index
90.7
MMLU-Pro
83.2%
LiveCodeBench
85.9%
MATH-500
98.9%
AIME
94%
AIME 2025
90.7%
IFBench
68.7%
τ²-Bench
55.6%
Terminal-Bench Hard
15.2%
Speed
32.2 tok/s
0 tok/s
Latency
3.11s
0s
Intelligence per $
9.5
13.3

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How Kimi K3 and o4 Mini score

🏆 Best value & openness: Kimi K3 (4.6 vs 3.1 / 5)
CriterionKimi K3o4 Mini
Cost-efficiency3.04.0
Context window5.04.0
Openness5.01.5
Self-hosting5.01.0
Multimodality5.05.0

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

Kimi K3 Open

Moonshot AI · Open-weight

Kimi K3 is a 2.8T parameter open-weight multimodal reasoning model from Moonshot AI. It is suited for complex coding, knowledge work, and long-horizon agentic workflows, and is particularly strong at...

o4 Mini Paid

OpenAI · Proprietary

OpenAI o4-mini is a compact reasoning model in the o-series, optimized for fast, cost-efficient performance while retaining strong multimodal and agentic capabilities. It supports tool use and demonstrates competitive reasoning...

Other models in these families

These variants are tracked but not compared here — one page per family keeps the comparison readable.

Other variants tracked
Kimi K2.6Kimi K2.7 CodeKimi K2.5Kimi K2 ThinkingKimi K2 0905Kimi K2 0711MoonshotAI Kimi Latest
Other variants tracked
o4 Mini Higho4 Mini Deep Research

Frequently asked questions

Is Kimi K3 as good as o4 Mini?

Kimi K3 is open-weight and competitive on many tasks, but o4 Mini may still lead on the hardest reasoning and agentic work. The gap keeps narrowing — benchmark both on your actual use case before deciding.

Can I run Kimi K3 locally?

Yes. Kimi K3 has open weights, so you can self-host it on your own GPUs or run it via a low-cost API. o4 Mini is API-only and cannot be self-hosted.

Kimi K3 vs o4 Mini — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Kimi K3 if you want to self-host, keep your data private and skip per-token fees — it's open-weight and runs on your own hardware. Choose o4 Mini if you want frontier capability through a managed API with zero infrastructure to run.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →