AI Models · Paid vs Paid

Grok 4.6 Paid vs Solar Pro 3 Paid

Grok 4.6 vs Solar Pro 3 compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

Grok 4.6PaidxAI
$2 /M input
$6 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window500K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Solar Pro 3PaidUpstage
$0.15 /M input
$0.6 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window131K tokens
MultimodalNo
Self-hostNo
Choose Solar Pro 3 for the lower output price ($0.6/M vs $6/M). Choose Grok 4.6 if you need the larger 500K context window.

Grok 4.6 vs Solar Pro 3 specs

SpecGrok 4.6Solar Pro 3Winner
MakerxAIUpstage
TypeProprietaryProprietary
Context window500K tokens131K tokensGrok 4.6
Input price$2/M$0.15/MSolar Pro 3
Output price$6/M$0.6/MSolar Pro 3
Vision / multimodalYesNoGrok 4.6
Tool / function callingYesYes= Tie
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)
LicenseProprietaryProprietary

Price gap & when to choose each

10×cheaper per output token

Solar Pro 3 is ~10× cheaper than Grok 4.6 on output tokens ($0.6 vs $6 per M tokens).

Choose Grok 4.6 if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You need the longer 500K context window
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure
Choose Solar Pro 3 if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You want the lower output price
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

CapabilityGrok 4.6Solar Pro 3
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

Benchmarks: Grok 4.6 vs Solar Pro 3

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

Solar Pro 3 delivers more intelligence per dollar.
Grok 4.6
Solar Pro 3
Intelligence index
44.4
7.8
Coding index
76.8
16.2
GPQA
94.9%
72.4%
Humanity's Last Exam
42.9%
10.3%
Long Context Reasoning
80.3%
32.3%
SciCode
56.5%
25.5%
τ-Bench Banking
50.7%
8.7%
Terminal-Bench
88.4%
12%
IFBench
71.2%
τ²-Bench
86.3%
Terminal-Bench Hard
7.6%
Speed
71.4 tok/s
157.2 tok/s
Latency
38.01s
1.33s
Intelligence per $
14.8
29.8

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How Grok 4.6 and Solar Pro 3 score

🏆 Best value & openness: Grok 4.6 (3.2 vs 2.9 / 5)
CriterionGrok 4.6Solar Pro 3
Cost-efficiency4.05.0
Context window4.53.5
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality5.03.5

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

Grok 4.6 Paid

xAI · Proprietary

Grok 4.6 is SpaceXAI's smartest model with frontier performance on coding, knowledge work, and STEM.

Solar Pro 3 Paid

Upstage · Proprietary

Solar Pro 3 is Upstage's powerful Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) language model. With 102B total parameters and 12B active parameters per forward pass, it delivers exceptional performance while maintaining computational efficiency. Optimized...

Other models in these families

These variants are tracked but not compared here — one page per family keeps the comparison readable.

Other variants tracked
Grok 4.5Grok 4.20Grok 4.3Grok 4.3 (batch)Grok 4.20 Multi-AgentGrok Build 0.1

Frequently asked questions

Grok 4.6 vs Solar Pro 3 — which is cheaper?

Solar Pro 3 is cheaper on output ($0.6/M vs $6/M).

Which has the larger context window?

Grok 4.6 offers the larger context window (500K tokens).

Grok 4.6 vs Solar Pro 3 — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Solar Pro 3 for the lower output price ($0.6/M vs $6/M). Choose Grok 4.6 if you need the larger 500K context window.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →