AI Models · Paid vs Paid

Grok 4.6 Paid vs Seed 1.6 Paid

Grok 4.6 vs Seed 1.6 compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

Grok 4.6PaidxAI
$2 /M input
$6 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window500K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Seed 1.6PaidByteDance Seed
$0.25 /M input
$2 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window262K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Choose Seed 1.6 for the lower output price ($2/M vs $6/M). Choose Grok 4.6 if you need the larger 500K context window.

Grok 4.6 vs Seed 1.6 specs

SpecGrok 4.6Seed 1.6Winner
MakerxAIByteDance Seed
TypeProprietaryProprietary
Context window500K tokens262K tokensGrok 4.6
Input price$2/M$0.25/MSeed 1.6
Output price$6/M$2/MSeed 1.6
Vision / multimodalYesYes= Tie
Tool / function callingYesYes= Tie
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)
LicenseProprietaryProprietary

Price gap & when to choose each

3.0×cheaper per output token

Seed 1.6 is ~3.0× cheaper than Grok 4.6 on output tokens ($2 vs $6 per M tokens).

Choose Grok 4.6 if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You need the longer 500K context window
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure
Choose Seed 1.6 if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You want the lower output price
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

CapabilityGrok 4.6Seed 1.6
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

Benchmarks: Grok 4.6 vs Seed 1.6

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

Grok 4.6
Seed 1.6
Intelligence index
44.4
Coding index
76.8
GPQA
94.9%
Humanity's Last Exam
42.9%
Long Context Reasoning
80.3%
SciCode
56.5%
τ-Bench Banking
50.7%
Terminal-Bench
88.4%
Speed
71.4 tok/s
Latency
38.01s
Intelligence per $
14.8

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How Grok 4.6 and Seed 1.6 score

🤝 Neck and neck on these criteria (3.2 vs 3.2 / 5).
CriterionGrok 4.6Seed 1.6
Cost-efficiency4.04.5
Context window4.54.0
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality5.05.0

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

Grok 4.6 Paid

xAI · Proprietary

Grok 4.6 is SpaceXAI's smartest model with frontier performance on coding, knowledge work, and STEM.

Seed 1.6 Paid

ByteDance Seed · Proprietary

Seed 1.6 is a general-purpose model released by the ByteDance Seed team. It incorporates multimodal capabilities and adaptive deep thinking with a 256K context window.

Other models in these families

These variants are tracked but not compared here — one page per family keeps the comparison readable.

Other variants tracked
Grok 4.5Grok 4.20Grok 4.3Grok 4.3 (batch)Grok 4.20 Multi-AgentGrok Build 0.1

Frequently asked questions

Grok 4.6 vs Seed 1.6 — which is cheaper?

Seed 1.6 is cheaper on output ($2/M vs $6/M).

Which has the larger context window?

Grok 4.6 offers the larger context window (500K tokens).

Grok 4.6 vs Seed 1.6 — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Seed 1.6 for the lower output price ($2/M vs $6/M). Choose Grok 4.6 if you need the larger 500K context window.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →