AI Models · Paid vs Paid

Grok 4.6 Paid vs Seed 1.6 Flash Paid

Grok 4.6 vs Seed 1.6 Flash compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

Grok 4.6PaidxAI
$2 /M input
$6 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window500K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Seed 1.6 FlashPaidByteDance Seed
$0.08 /M input
$0.3 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window262K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Choose Seed 1.6 Flash for the lower output price ($0.3/M vs $6/M). Choose Grok 4.6 if you need the larger 500K context window.

Grok 4.6 vs Seed 1.6 Flash specs

SpecGrok 4.6Seed 1.6 FlashWinner
MakerxAIByteDance Seed
TypeProprietaryProprietary
Context window500K tokens262K tokensGrok 4.6
Input price$2/M$0.08/MSeed 1.6 Flash
Output price$6/M$0.3/MSeed 1.6 Flash
Vision / multimodalYesYes= Tie
Tool / function callingYesYes= Tie
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)
LicenseProprietaryProprietary

Price gap & when to choose each

20×cheaper per output token

Seed 1.6 Flash is ~20× cheaper than Grok 4.6 on output tokens ($0.3 vs $6 per M tokens).

Choose Grok 4.6 if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You need the longer 500K context window
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure
Choose Seed 1.6 Flash if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You want the lower output price
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

CapabilityGrok 4.6Seed 1.6 Flash
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

Benchmarks: Grok 4.6 vs Seed 1.6 Flash

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

Grok 4.6
Seed 1.6 Flash
Intelligence index
44.4
Coding index
76.8
GPQA
94.9%
Humanity's Last Exam
42.9%
Long Context Reasoning
80.3%
SciCode
56.5%
τ-Bench Banking
50.7%
Terminal-Bench
88.4%
Speed
71.4 tok/s
Latency
38.01s
Intelligence per $
14.8

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How Grok 4.6 and Seed 1.6 Flash score

🤝 Neck and neck on these criteria (3.2 vs 3.3 / 5).
CriterionGrok 4.6Seed 1.6 Flash
Cost-efficiency4.05.0
Context window4.54.0
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality5.05.0

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

Grok 4.6 Paid

xAI · Proprietary

Grok 4.6 is SpaceXAI's smartest model with frontier performance on coding, knowledge work, and STEM.

Seed 1.6 Flash Paid

ByteDance Seed · Proprietary

Seed 1.6 Flash is an ultra-fast multimodal deep thinking model by ByteDance Seed, supporting both text and visual understanding. It features a 256k context window and can generate outputs of...

Other models in these families

These variants are tracked but not compared here — one page per family keeps the comparison readable.

Other variants tracked
Grok 4.5Grok 4.20Grok 4.3Grok 4.3 (batch)Grok 4.20 Multi-AgentGrok Build 0.1

Frequently asked questions

Grok 4.6 vs Seed 1.6 Flash — which is cheaper?

Seed 1.6 Flash is cheaper on output ($0.3/M vs $6/M).

Which has the larger context window?

Grok 4.6 offers the larger context window (500K tokens).

Grok 4.6 vs Seed 1.6 Flash — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Seed 1.6 Flash for the lower output price ($0.3/M vs $6/M). Choose Grok 4.6 if you need the larger 500K context window.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →