AI Models · Paid vs Paid

Grok 4.6 Paid vs GPT-4o (batch) Paid

Grok 4.6 vs GPT-4o (batch) compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

Grok 4.6PaidxAI
$2 /M input
$6 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window500K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
GPT-4o (batch)PaidOpenAI
$1.25 /M input
$5 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window128K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Choose GPT-4o (batch) for the lower output price ($5/M vs $6/M). Choose Grok 4.6 if you need the larger 500K context window.

Grok 4.6 vs GPT-4o (batch) specs

SpecGrok 4.6GPT-4o (batch)Winner
MakerxAIOpenAI
TypeProprietaryProprietary
Context window500K tokens128K tokensGrok 4.6
Input price$2/M$1.25/MGPT-4o (batch)
Output price$6/M$5/MGPT-4o (batch)
Vision / multimodalYesYes= Tie
Tool / function callingYesYes= Tie
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)
LicenseProprietaryProprietary

Price gap & when to choose each

Choose Grok 4.6 if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You need the longer 500K context window
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure
Choose GPT-4o (batch) if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You want the lower output price
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

CapabilityGrok 4.6GPT-4o (batch)
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

Benchmarks: Grok 4.6 vs GPT-4o (batch)

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

Grok 4.6
GPT-4o (batch)
Intelligence index
44.4
9
Coding index
76.8
GPQA
94.9%
65.5%
Humanity's Last Exam
42.9%
4%
Long Context Reasoning
80.3%
SciCode
56.5%
τ-Bench Banking
50.7%
Terminal-Bench
88.4%
Math index
25.7
MMLU-Pro
80.3%
LiveCodeBench
42.5%
MATH-500
89.3%
AIME
32.7%
AIME 2025
25.7%
Speed
71.4 tok/s
0 tok/s
Latency
38.01s
0s
Intelligence per $
14.8

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How Grok 4.6 and GPT-4o (batch) score

🤝 Neck and neck on these criteria (3.2 vs 3.0 / 5).
CriterionGrok 4.6GPT-4o (batch)
Cost-efficiency4.04.0
Context window4.53.5
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality5.05.0

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

Grok 4.6 Paid

xAI · Proprietary

Grok 4.6 is SpaceXAI's smartest model with frontier performance on coding, knowledge work, and STEM.

GPT-4o (batch) Paid

OpenAI · Proprietary

GPT-4o ("o" for "omni") is OpenAI's latest AI model, supporting both text and image inputs with text outputs. It maintains the intelligence level of [GPT-4 Turbo](/models/openai/gpt-4-turbo) while being twice as...

Other models in these families

These variants are tracked but not compared here — one page per family keeps the comparison readable.

Other variants tracked
Grok 4.5Grok 4.20Grok 4.3Grok 4.3 (batch)Grok 4.20 Multi-AgentGrok Build 0.1

Frequently asked questions

Grok 4.6 vs GPT-4o (batch) — which is cheaper?

GPT-4o (batch) is cheaper on output ($5/M vs $6/M).

Which has the larger context window?

Grok 4.6 offers the larger context window (500K tokens).

Grok 4.6 vs GPT-4o (batch) — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose GPT-4o (batch) for the lower output price ($5/M vs $6/M). Choose Grok 4.6 if you need the larger 500K context window.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →