AI Models · Open-Source vs Paid

Granite 4.0 Micro Open vs GPT-5.6 Terra Paid

Granite 4.0 Micro vs GPT-5.6 Terra compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Can the open-source model replace the paid one? Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · OpenSourceAI.tech

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

Choose Granite 4.0 Micro if you want to self-host, keep your data private and skip per-token fees — it's open-weight and runs on your own hardware. Choose GPT-5.6 Terra if you want frontier capability through a managed API with zero infrastructure to run.

Granite 4.0 Micro vs GPT-5.6 Terra specs

SpecGranite 4.0 MicroGPT-5.6 Terra
MakerIBMOpenAI
TypeOpen-weightProprietary
Context window131K tokens1.1M tokens
Input price$0.02/M · free self-host$2.5/M
Output price$0.11/M · free self-host$15/M
Vision / multimodalNoYes
Tool / function callingNoYes
Self-hostableYesNo (API only)
LicenseApache 2.0Proprietary

Feature comparison

CapabilityGranite 4.0 MicroGPT-5.6 Terra
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

Benchmarks: Granite 4.0 Micro vs GPT-5.6 Terra

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

Granite 4.0 Micro
GPT-5.6 Terra
Intelligence index
2.4
55
Math index
6
GPQA
33.6%
92.5%
MMLU-Pro
44.7%
Humanity's Last Exam
5.1%
41.8%
Long Context Reasoning
4%
74%
LiveCodeBench
18%
SciCode
11.9%
53.9%
AIME 2025
6%
IFBench
24.8%
71.2%
τ²-Bench
12.6%
86.3%
Terminal-Bench Hard
1.5%
57.6%
Coding index
76.7
τ-Bench Banking
31.8%
Terminal-Bench
88%
Speed
0 tok/s
153.9 tok/s
Latency
0s
102.59s
Intelligence per $
9.8

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How Granite 4.0 Micro and GPT-5.6 Terra score

🏆 Best value & openness: Granite 4.0 Micro (4.1 vs 3.1 / 5)
CriterionGranite 4.0 MicroGPT-5.6 Terra
Cost-efficiency5.03.0
Context window3.55.0
Openness5.01.5
Self-hosting5.01.0
Multimodality2.05.0

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

Granite 4.0 Micro Open

IBM · Open-weight

Granite-4.0-H-Micro is a 3B parameter from the Granite 4 family of models. These models are the latest in a series of models released by IBM. They are fine-tuned for long...

GPT-5.6 Terra Paid

OpenAI · Proprietary

GPT-5.6 Terra is a balanced model in OpenAI's GPT-5.6 series, positioned between the flagship Sol tier and the cost-efficient Luna tier. It is suited for everyday coding, reasoning, and agentic...

Other models in these families

These variants are tracked but not compared here — one page per family keeps the comparison readable.

Other variants tracked
Granite 4.1 8B

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.0 Micro as good as GPT-5.6 Terra?

Granite 4.0 Micro is open-weight and competitive on many tasks, but GPT-5.6 Terra may still lead on the hardest reasoning and agentic work. The gap keeps narrowing — benchmark both on your actual use case before deciding.

Can I run Granite 4.0 Micro locally?

Yes. Granite 4.0 Micro has open weights, so you can self-host it on your own GPUs or run it via a low-cost API. GPT-5.6 Terra is API-only and cannot be self-hosted.

How much cheaper is Granite 4.0 Micro?

Granite 4.0 Micro costs $0.11/M output vs $15/M for GPT-5.6 Terra — roughly 136x cheaper via API, and free if you self-host.

Granite 4.0 Micro vs GPT-5.6 Terra — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Granite 4.0 Micro if you want to self-host, keep your data private and skip per-token fees — it's open-weight and runs on your own hardware. Choose GPT-5.6 Terra if you want frontier capability through a managed API with zero infrastructure to run.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →