gpt-oss-120b (batch) vs Sakana Namazu compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Can the open-source model replace the paid one? Full 2026 breakdown.
Sakana Namazu — full profile ›
Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai
Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.
| Spec | gpt-oss-120b (batch) | Sakana Namazu | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maker | OpenAI | Sakana AI | – |
| Type | Open-weight | Proprietary | |
| Context window | 131K tokens | 262K tokens | SASakana Namazu |
| Input price | $0.15/M · free self-host | $0.95/M | |
| Output price | $0.6/M · free self-host | $4/M | |
| Vision / multimodal | No | Yes | SASakana Namazu |
| Tool / function calling | Yes | Yes | = Tie |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No (API only) | |
| License | Apache 2.0 | Proprietary |
gpt-oss-120b (batch) is ~6.7× cheaper than Sakana Namazu on output tokens ($0.6 vs $4 per M tokens).
| Capability | gpt-oss-120b (batch) | Sakana Namazu |
|---|---|---|
| Open weights (downloadable) | ✓ | ✗ |
| Self-hostable | ✓ | ✗ |
| Runs fully offline | ✓ | ✗ |
| Vision / multimodal | ✗ | ✓ |
| Tool / function calling | ✓ | ✓ |
| 1M+ context window | ✗ | ✗ |
Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).
Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.
| Criterion | gpt-oss-120b (batch) | Sakana Namazu |
|---|---|---|
| Cost-efficiency | 5.0 | 4.0 |
| Context window | 3.5 | 4.0 |
| Openness | 5.0 | 1.5 |
| Self-hosting | 5.0 | 1.0 |
| Multimodality | 3.5 | 5.0 |
Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.
gpt-oss-120b is an open-weight, 117B-parameter Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) language model from OpenAI designed for high-reasoning, agentic, and general-purpose production use cases. It activates 5.1B parameters per forward pass and is optimize
Sakana Namazu is a Japanese-specialized reasoning model from Sakana AI, based on Kimi K2.6 with additional training for Japanese language and business contexts. It is suited for Japanese instruction following,...
These variants are tracked but not compared here — one page per family keeps the comparison readable.
gpt-oss-120b (batch) is open-weight and competitive on many tasks, but Sakana Namazu may still lead on the hardest reasoning and agentic work. The gap keeps narrowing — benchmark both on your actual use case before deciding.
Yes. gpt-oss-120b (batch) has open weights, so you can self-host it on your own GPUs or run it via a low-cost API. Sakana Namazu is API-only and cannot be self-hosted.
gpt-oss-120b (batch) costs $0.6/M output vs $4/M for Sakana Namazu — roughly 7x cheaper via API, and free if you self-host.
Choose gpt-oss-120b (batch) if you want to self-host, keep your data private and skip per-token fees — it's open-weight and runs on your own hardware. Choose Sakana Namazu if you want frontier capability through a managed API with zero infrastructure to run.
Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.
Open the leaderboard →