AI Models · Open-Source vs Paid

gpt-oss-120b (batch) Open vs Muse Spark 1.2 Paid

gpt-oss-120b (batch) vs Muse Spark 1.2 compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Can the open-source model replace the paid one? Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

gpt-oss-120b (batch)OpenOpenAI
$0.15 /M input
$0.6 /M outputNo per-token fees if you self-host
TypeOpen-weight
Context window131K tokens
MultimodalNo
Self-hostYes
Muse Spark 1.2PaidMeta
$1.25 /M input
$4.25 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window1M tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Choose gpt-oss-120b (batch) if you want to self-host, keep your data private and skip per-token fees — it's open-weight and runs on your own hardware. Choose Muse Spark 1.2 if you want frontier capability through a managed API with zero infrastructure to run.

gpt-oss-120b (batch) vs Muse Spark 1.2 specs

Specgpt-oss-120b (batch)Muse Spark 1.2Winner
MakerOpenAIMeta
TypeOpen-weightProprietarygpt-oss-120b (batch)
Context window131K tokens1M tokensMuse Spark 1.2
Input price$0.15/M · free self-host$1.25/Mgpt-oss-120b (batch)
Output price$0.6/M · free self-host$4.25/Mgpt-oss-120b (batch)
Vision / multimodalNoYesMuse Spark 1.2
Tool / function callingYesYes= Tie
Self-hostableYesNo (API only)gpt-oss-120b (batch)
LicenseApache 2.0Proprietarygpt-oss-120b (batch)

Price gap & when to choose each

7.1×cheaper per output token

gpt-oss-120b (batch) is ~7.1× cheaper than Muse Spark 1.2 on output tokens ($0.6 vs $4.25 per M tokens).

Choose gpt-oss-120b (batch) if…
  • You want to self-host or run on your cloud
  • You prioritize data privacy & control
  • You want the lowest operating costs
  • You are building open or reproducible AI
Choose Muse Spark 1.2 if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You need the longer 1M context window
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

Capabilitygpt-oss-120b (batch)Muse Spark 1.2
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

Benchmarks: gpt-oss-120b (batch) vs Muse Spark 1.2

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

gpt-oss-120b (batch) delivers 2.4× more intelligence per dollar.
gpt-oss-120b (batch)
Muse Spark 1.2
Intelligence index
12.3
39.8
Coding index
30.4
72.2
Math index
93.4
GPQA
78.2%
90.4%
MMLU-Pro
80.8%
Humanity's Last Exam
19.6%
45.5%
Long Context Reasoning
52%
79%
LiveCodeBench
87.8%
SciCode
34%
57.4%
AIME 2025
93.4%
IFBench
69%
τ²-Bench
65.8%
τ-Bench Banking
12.8%
34.8%
Terminal-Bench
26.2%
80.1%
Terminal-Bench Hard
23.5%
Speed
179 tok/s
250.1 tok/s
Latency
0.51s
10.81s
Intelligence per $
47.1
19.9

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How gpt-oss-120b (batch) and Muse Spark 1.2 score

🏆 Best value & openness: gpt-oss-120b (batch) (4.4 vs 3.3 / 5)
Criteriongpt-oss-120b (batch)Muse Spark 1.2
Cost-efficiency5.04.0
Context window3.55.0
Openness5.01.5
Self-hosting5.01.0
Multimodality3.55.0

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

gpt-oss-120b (batch) Open

OpenAI · Open-weight

gpt-oss-120b is an open-weight, 117B-parameter Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) language model from OpenAI designed for high-reasoning, agentic, and general-purpose production use cases. It activates 5.1B parameters per forward pass and is optimize

Muse Spark 1.2 Paid

Meta · Proprietary

Muse Spark 1.2 is a reasoning model from Meta, designed for complex agentic tasks. It accepts text, images, video, audio, and PDF documents, returns text, and offers a 1M-token context...

Other models in these families

These variants are tracked but not compared here — one page per family keeps the comparison readable.

Other variants tracked
gpt-oss-120bgpt-oss-20b (batch)gpt-oss-20bgpt-oss-safeguard-20b

Frequently asked questions

Is gpt-oss-120b (batch) as good as Muse Spark 1.2?

gpt-oss-120b (batch) is open-weight and competitive on many tasks, but Muse Spark 1.2 may still lead on the hardest reasoning and agentic work. The gap keeps narrowing — benchmark both on your actual use case before deciding.

Can I run gpt-oss-120b (batch) locally?

Yes. gpt-oss-120b (batch) has open weights, so you can self-host it on your own GPUs or run it via a low-cost API. Muse Spark 1.2 is API-only and cannot be self-hosted.

How much cheaper is gpt-oss-120b (batch)?

gpt-oss-120b (batch) costs $0.6/M output vs $4.25/M for Muse Spark 1.2 — roughly 7x cheaper via API, and free if you self-host.

gpt-oss-120b (batch) vs Muse Spark 1.2 — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose gpt-oss-120b (batch) if you want to self-host, keep your data private and skip per-token fees — it's open-weight and runs on your own hardware. Choose Muse Spark 1.2 if you want frontier capability through a managed API with zero infrastructure to run.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →