AI Models · Open-Source vs Paid

gpt-oss-120b Open vs GPT-4o-mini (batch) Paid

gpt-oss-120b vs GPT-4o-mini (batch) compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Can the open-source model replace the paid one? Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

gpt-oss-120bOpenOpenAI
$0.04 /M input
$0.17 /M outputNo per-token fees if you self-host
TypeOpen-weight
Context window131K tokens
MultimodalNo
Self-hostYes
GPT-4o-mini (batch)PaidOpenAI
$0.08 /M input
$0.3 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window128K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Choose gpt-oss-120b if you want to self-host, keep your data private and skip per-token fees — it's open-weight and runs on your own hardware. Choose GPT-4o-mini (batch) if you want frontier capability through a managed API with zero infrastructure to run.

gpt-oss-120b vs GPT-4o-mini (batch) specs

Specgpt-oss-120bGPT-4o-mini (batch)Winner
MakerOpenAIOpenAI–
TypeOpen-weightProprietarygpt-oss-120b
Context window131K tokens128K tokensgpt-oss-120b
Input price$0.04/M · free self-host$0.08/Mgpt-oss-120b
Output price$0.17/M · free self-host$0.3/Mgpt-oss-120b
Vision / multimodalNoYesGPT-4o-mini (batch)
Tool / function callingYesYes= Tie
Self-hostableYesNo (API only)gpt-oss-120b
LicenseApache 2.0Proprietarygpt-oss-120b

Price gap & when to choose each

1.8×cheaper per output token

gpt-oss-120b is ~1.8× cheaper than GPT-4o-mini (batch) on output tokens ($0.17 vs $0.3 per M tokens).

Choose gpt-oss-120b if…
  • You want to self-host or run on your cloud
  • You need the longer 131K context window
  • You prioritize data privacy & control
  • You want the lowest operating costs
  • You are building open or reproducible AI
Choose GPT-4o-mini (batch) if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

Capabilitygpt-oss-120bGPT-4o-mini (batch)
Open weights (downloadable)✓✗
Self-hostable✓✗
Runs fully offline✓✗
Vision / multimodal✗✓
Tool / function calling✓✓
1M+ context window✗✗

Benchmarks: gpt-oss-120b vs GPT-4o-mini (batch)

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

gpt-oss-120b
GPT-4o-mini (batch)
Intelligence index
11.6
6.7
Coding index
30.4
11.4
Math index
93.4
14.7
GPQA
78.2%
42.6%
MMLU-Pro
80.8%
64.8%
Humanity's Last Exam
19.6%
4.2%
Long Context Reasoning
52%
–
LiveCodeBench
87.8%
23.4%
SciCode
34%
–
AIME 2025
93.4%
14.7%
IFBench
69%
31%
τ²-Bench
65.8%
–
τ-Bench Banking
12.8%
2.9%
Terminal-Bench
26.2%
5.6%
Terminal-Bench Hard
23.5%
–
MATH-500
–
78.9%
AIME
–
11.7%
Speed
195.5 tok/s
0 tok/s
Latency
0.52s
0s
Intelligence per $
44.6
25.6

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How gpt-oss-120b and GPT-4o-mini (batch) score

🏆 Best value & openness: gpt-oss-120b (4.4 vs 3.2 / 5)
Criteriongpt-oss-120bGPT-4o-mini (batch)
Cost-efficiency5.05.0
Context window3.53.5
Openness5.01.5
Self-hosting5.01.0
Multimodality3.55.0

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

gpt-oss-120b Open

OpenAI · Open-weight

gpt-oss-120b is an open-weight, 117B-parameter Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) language model from OpenAI designed for high-reasoning, agentic, and general-purpose production use cases. It activates 5.1B parameters per forward pass and is optimize

GPT-4o-mini (batch) Paid

OpenAI · Proprietary

GPT-4o mini is OpenAI's newest model after [GPT-4 Omni](/models/openai/gpt-4o), supporting both text and image inputs with text outputs. As their most advanced small model, it is many multiples more affordable...

Other models in these families

These variants are tracked but not compared here — one page per family keeps the comparison readable.

Other variants tracked
gpt-oss-120b (batch)gpt-oss-20b (batch)gpt-oss-20bgpt-oss-safeguard-20b

Frequently asked questions

Is gpt-oss-120b as good as GPT-4o-mini (batch)?

gpt-oss-120b is open-weight and competitive on many tasks, but GPT-4o-mini (batch) may still lead on the hardest reasoning and agentic work. The gap keeps narrowing — benchmark both on your actual use case before deciding.

Can I run gpt-oss-120b locally?

Yes. gpt-oss-120b has open weights, so you can self-host it on your own GPUs or run it via a low-cost API. GPT-4o-mini (batch) is API-only and cannot be self-hosted.

How much cheaper is gpt-oss-120b?

gpt-oss-120b costs $0.17/M output vs $0.3/M for GPT-4o-mini (batch) — roughly 2x cheaper via API, and free if you self-host.

gpt-oss-120b vs GPT-4o-mini (batch) — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose gpt-oss-120b if you want to self-host, keep your data private and skip per-token fees — it's open-weight and runs on your own hardware. Choose GPT-4o-mini (batch) if you want frontier capability through a managed API with zero infrastructure to run.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →