AI Models · Open-Source vs Paid

gpt-oss-120b (batch) Open vs Claude Sonnet 5 Paid

gpt-oss-120b (batch) vs Claude Sonnet 5 compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Can the open-source model replace the paid one? Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

gpt-oss-120b (batch)OpenOpenAI
$0.15 /M input
$0.6 /M outputNo per-token fees if you self-host
TypeOpen-weight
Context window131K tokens
MultimodalNo
Self-hostYes
Claude Sonnet 5PaidAnthropic
$2 /M input
$10 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window1M tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Choose gpt-oss-120b (batch) if you want to self-host, keep your data private and skip per-token fees — it's open-weight and runs on your own hardware. Choose Claude Sonnet 5 if you want frontier capability through a managed API with zero infrastructure to run.

gpt-oss-120b (batch) vs Claude Sonnet 5 specs

Specgpt-oss-120b (batch)Claude Sonnet 5Winner
MakerOpenAIAnthropic
TypeOpen-weightProprietarygpt-oss-120b (batch)
Context window131K tokens1M tokensClaude Sonnet 5
Input price$0.15/M · free self-host$2/Mgpt-oss-120b (batch)
Output price$0.6/M · free self-host$10/Mgpt-oss-120b (batch)
Vision / multimodalNoYesClaude Sonnet 5
Tool / function callingYesYes= Tie
Self-hostableYesNo (API only)gpt-oss-120b (batch)
LicenseApache 2.0Proprietarygpt-oss-120b (batch)

Price gap & when to choose each

17×cheaper per output token

gpt-oss-120b (batch) is ~17× cheaper than Claude Sonnet 5 on output tokens ($0.6 vs $10 per M tokens).

Choose gpt-oss-120b (batch) if…
  • You want to self-host or run on your cloud
  • You prioritize data privacy & control
  • You want the lowest operating costs
  • You are building open or reproducible AI
Choose Claude Sonnet 5 if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You need the longer 1M context window
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

Capabilitygpt-oss-120b (batch)Claude Sonnet 5
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

Benchmarks: gpt-oss-120b (batch) vs Claude Sonnet 5

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

gpt-oss-120b (batch) delivers 4.9× more intelligence per dollar.
gpt-oss-120b (batch)
Claude Sonnet 5
Intelligence index
12.3
38.4
Coding index
30.4
71.5
Math index
93.4
GPQA
78.2%
91.1%
MMLU-Pro
80.8%
Humanity's Last Exam
19.6%
41.3%
Long Context Reasoning
52%
82%
LiveCodeBench
87.8%
SciCode
34%
54.3%
AIME 2025
93.4%
IFBench
69%
τ²-Bench
65.8%
τ-Bench Banking
12.8%
37.3%
Terminal-Bench
26.2%
80.5%
Terminal-Bench Hard
23.5%
Speed
179 tok/s
83.2 tok/s
Latency
0.51s
114.22s
Intelligence per $
47.1
9.6

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How gpt-oss-120b (batch) and Claude Sonnet 5 score

🏆 Best value & openness: gpt-oss-120b (batch) (4.4 vs 3.2 / 5)
Criteriongpt-oss-120b (batch)Claude Sonnet 5
Cost-efficiency5.03.5
Context window3.55.0
Openness5.01.5
Self-hosting5.01.0
Multimodality3.55.0

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

gpt-oss-120b (batch) Open

OpenAI · Open-weight

gpt-oss-120b is an open-weight, 117B-parameter Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) language model from OpenAI designed for high-reasoning, agentic, and general-purpose production use cases. It activates 5.1B parameters per forward pass and is optimize

Claude Sonnet 5 Paid

Anthropic · Proprietary

Sonnet 5 is Anthropic's most capable Sonnet-class model, with frontier performance across coding, agents, and professional work. It supports adaptive thinking with selectable reasoning effort levels (low, medium, high, max,...

Other models in these families

These variants are tracked but not compared here — one page per family keeps the comparison readable.

Other variants tracked
gpt-oss-120bgpt-oss-20b (batch)gpt-oss-20bgpt-oss-safeguard-20b
Other variants tracked
Claude Sonnet 5 (batch)Claude Sonnet 4.6Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch)Claude Sonnet 4.5Claude Sonnet 4.5 (batch)Claude Sonnet 4

Frequently asked questions

Is gpt-oss-120b (batch) as good as Claude Sonnet 5?

gpt-oss-120b (batch) is open-weight and competitive on many tasks, but Claude Sonnet 5 may still lead on the hardest reasoning and agentic work. The gap keeps narrowing — benchmark both on your actual use case before deciding.

Can I run gpt-oss-120b (batch) locally?

Yes. gpt-oss-120b (batch) has open weights, so you can self-host it on your own GPUs or run it via a low-cost API. Claude Sonnet 5 is API-only and cannot be self-hosted.

How much cheaper is gpt-oss-120b (batch)?

gpt-oss-120b (batch) costs $0.6/M output vs $10/M for Claude Sonnet 5 — roughly 17x cheaper via API, and free if you self-host.

gpt-oss-120b (batch) vs Claude Sonnet 5 — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose gpt-oss-120b (batch) if you want to self-host, keep your data private and skip per-token fees — it's open-weight and runs on your own hardware. Choose Claude Sonnet 5 if you want frontier capability through a managed API with zero infrastructure to run.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →