GPT Chat Latest Paid vs INLing 3.1 Flash Paid
GPT Chat Latest vs Ling 3.1 Flash compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.
GPT Chat Latest — full profile › · Ling 3.1 Flash — full profile ›
Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai
Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.
$30 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
$0.22 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
GPT Chat Latest vs Ling 3.1 Flash specs
| Spec | GPT Chat Latest | Ling 3.1 Flash | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maker | OpenAI | InclusionAI | – |
| Type | Proprietary | Proprietary | – |
| Context window | 400K tokens | 262K tokens | |
| Input price | $5/M | $0.08/M | INLing 3.1 Flash |
| Output price | $30/M | $0.22/M | INLing 3.1 Flash |
| Vision / multimodal | Yes | No | |
| Tool / function calling | Yes | Yes | = Tie |
| Self-hostable | No (API only) | No (API only) | – |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary | – |
Price gap & when to choose each
Ling 3.1 Flash is ~136× cheaper than GPT Chat Latest on output tokens ($0.22 vs $30 per M tokens).
- You want frontier performance through a managed API
- You need the longer 400K context window
- You value reliability & ecosystem
- You don't want to manage infrastructure
- You want frontier performance through a managed API
- You want the lower output price
- You value reliability & ecosystem
- You don't want to manage infrastructure
Feature comparison
| Capability | GPT Chat Latest | Ling 3.1 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Open weights (downloadable) | ✗ | ✗ |
| Self-hostable | ✗ | ✗ |
| Runs fully offline | ✗ | ✗ |
| Vision / multimodal | ✓ | ✗ |
| Tool / function calling | ✓ | ✓ |
| 1M+ context window | ✗ | ✗ |
Benchmarks: GPT Chat Latest vs Ling 3.1 Flash
Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).
Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.
How GPT Chat Latest and Ling 3.1 Flash score
| Criterion | GPT Chat Latest | Ling 3.1 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Cost-efficiency | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| Context window | 4.5 | 4.0 |
| Openness | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Self-hosting | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Multimodality | 5.0 | 3.5 |
Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.
What each model is
GPT Chat Latest Paid
GPT Chat Latest points to OpenAI's stable API alias `chat-latest` that always resolves to the latest Instant chat model used in ChatGPT. As OpenAI rolls out new Instant model updates...
Ling 3.1 Flash Paid
Ling 3.1 Flash is a hybrid reasoning mixture-of-experts model from inclusionAI, with 25B active parameters out of 560B total.
Frequently asked questions
GPT Chat Latest vs Ling 3.1 Flash — which is cheaper?
Ling 3.1 Flash is cheaper on output ($0.22/M vs $30/M).
Which has the larger context window?
GPT Chat Latest offers the larger context window (400K tokens).
GPT Chat Latest vs Ling 3.1 Flash — which should I pick in 2026?
Choose Ling 3.1 Flash for the lower output price ($0.22/M vs $30/M). Choose GPT Chat Latest if you need the larger 400K context window.
People also compare
Explore more open-source AI
Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.
Open the leaderboard →