GPT Chat Latest vs Claude Sonnet 5 compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.
GPT Chat Latest — full profile › · Claude Sonnet 5 — full profile ›
Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai
Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.
| Spec | GPT Chat Latest | Claude Sonnet 5 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maker | OpenAI | Anthropic | – |
| Type | Proprietary | Proprietary | – |
| Context window | 400K tokens | 1M tokens | |
| Input price | $5/M | $2/M | |
| Output price | $30/M | $10/M | |
| Vision / multimodal | Yes | Yes | = Tie |
| Tool / function calling | Yes | Yes | = Tie |
| Self-hostable | No (API only) | No (API only) | – |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary | – |
Claude Sonnet 5 is ~3.0× cheaper than GPT Chat Latest on output tokens ($10 vs $30 per M tokens).
| Capability | GPT Chat Latest | Claude Sonnet 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Open weights (downloadable) | ✗ | ✗ |
| Self-hostable | ✗ | ✗ |
| Runs fully offline | ✗ | ✗ |
| Vision / multimodal | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tool / function calling | ✓ | ✓ |
| 1M+ context window | ✗ | ✓ |
Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).
Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.
| Criterion | GPT Chat Latest | Claude Sonnet 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost-efficiency | 3.0 | 3.5 |
| Context window | 4.5 | 5.0 |
| Openness | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Self-hosting | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Multimodality | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.
GPT Chat Latest points to OpenAI's stable API alias `chat-latest` that always resolves to the latest Instant chat model used in ChatGPT. As OpenAI rolls out new Instant model updates...
Sonnet 5 is Anthropic's most capable Sonnet-class model, with frontier performance across coding, agents, and professional work. It supports adaptive thinking with selectable reasoning effort levels (low, medium, high, max,...
These variants are tracked but not compared here — one page per family keeps the comparison readable.
Claude Sonnet 5 is cheaper on output ($10/M vs $30/M).
Claude Sonnet 5 offers the larger context window (1M tokens).
Choose Claude Sonnet 5 for the lower output price ($10/M vs $30/M). It also gives you the larger 1M context window.
Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.
Open the leaderboard →