AI Models · Paid vs Paid

GPT Chat Latest Paid vs Claude Haiku 5.5 Paid

GPT Chat Latest vs Claude Haiku 5.5 compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

GPT Chat LatestPaidOpenAI
$5 /M input
$30 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window400K tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Claude Haiku 5.5PaidAnthropic
$0.1 /M input
$0.5 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window1M tokens
MultimodalYes
Self-hostNo
Choose Claude Haiku 5.5 for the lower output price ($0.5/M vs $30/M). It also gives you the larger 1M context window.

GPT Chat Latest vs Claude Haiku 5.5 specs

SpecGPT Chat LatestClaude Haiku 5.5Winner
MakerOpenAIAnthropic–
TypeProprietaryProprietary–
Context window400K tokens1M tokensClaude Haiku 5.5
Input price$5/M$0.1/MClaude Haiku 5.5
Output price$30/M$0.5/MClaude Haiku 5.5
Vision / multimodalYesYes= Tie
Tool / function callingYesYes= Tie
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)–
LicenseProprietaryProprietary–

Price gap & when to choose each

60×cheaper per output token

Claude Haiku 5.5 is ~60× cheaper than GPT Chat Latest on output tokens ($0.5 vs $30 per M tokens).

Choose GPT Chat Latest if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure
Choose Claude Haiku 5.5 if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You need the longer 1M context window
  • You want the lower output price
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

CapabilityGPT Chat LatestClaude Haiku 5.5
Open weights (downloadable)✗✗
Self-hostable✗✗
Runs fully offline✗✗
Vision / multimodal✓✓
Tool / function calling✓✓
1M+ context window✗✓

Benchmarks: GPT Chat Latest vs Claude Haiku 5.5

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

GPT Chat Latest
Claude Haiku 5.5
Intelligence index
–
43.4
Humanity's Last Exam
–
44.4%
Long Context Reasoning
–
82.7%
SciCode
–
55%
Speed
–
235.2 tok/s
Latency
–
218.11s
Intelligence per $
–
217

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How GPT Chat Latest and Claude Haiku 5.5 score

🏆 Best value & openness: Claude Haiku 5.5 (3.5 vs 3.0 / 5)
CriterionGPT Chat LatestClaude Haiku 5.5
Cost-efficiency3.05.0
Context window4.55.0
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality5.05.0

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

GPT Chat Latest Paid

OpenAI · Proprietary

GPT Chat Latest points to OpenAI's stable API alias `chat-latest` that always resolves to the latest Instant chat model used in ChatGPT. As OpenAI rolls out new Instant model updates...

Claude Haiku 5.5 Paid

Anthropic · Proprietary

Claude Haiku 5.5 is Anthropic's small, fast model for high-volume, cost-sensitive work such as summarization, subagents, and browser use. It succeeds Claude Haiku 4.5 with stronger coding, computer use, and...

Other models in these families

These variants are tracked but not compared here — one page per family keeps the comparison readable.

Other variants tracked
Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch)Claude Haiku 4.5Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch)

Frequently asked questions

GPT Chat Latest vs Claude Haiku 5.5 — which is cheaper?

Claude Haiku 5.5 is cheaper on output ($0.5/M vs $30/M).

Which has the larger context window?

Claude Haiku 5.5 offers the larger context window (1M tokens).

GPT Chat Latest vs Claude Haiku 5.5 — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Claude Haiku 5.5 for the lower output price ($0.5/M vs $30/M). It also gives you the larger 1M context window.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →