AI Models · Paid vs Paid

GPT Audio Paid vs Solar Pro 3 Paid

GPT Audio vs Solar Pro 3 compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.

Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai

Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.

GPT AudioPaidOpenAI
$2.5 /M input
$10 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window128K tokens
MultimodalNo
Self-hostNo
Solar Pro 3PaidUpstage
$0.15 /M input
$0.6 /M outputManaged API (no infra to run)
TypeProprietary
Context window131K tokens
MultimodalNo
Self-hostNo
Choose Solar Pro 3 for the lower output price ($0.6/M vs $10/M). It also gives you the larger 131K context window.

GPT Audio vs Solar Pro 3 specs

SpecGPT AudioSolar Pro 3Winner
MakerOpenAIUpstage
TypeProprietaryProprietary
Context window128K tokens131K tokensSolar Pro 3
Input price$2.5/M$0.15/MSolar Pro 3
Output price$10/M$0.6/MSolar Pro 3
Vision / multimodalNoNo
Tool / function callingYesYes= Tie
Self-hostableNo (API only)No (API only)
LicenseProprietaryProprietary

Price gap & when to choose each

17×cheaper per output token

Solar Pro 3 is ~17× cheaper than GPT Audio on output tokens ($0.6 vs $10 per M tokens).

Choose GPT Audio if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure
Choose Solar Pro 3 if…
  • You want frontier performance through a managed API
  • You need the longer 131K context window
  • You want the lower output price
  • You value reliability & ecosystem
  • You don't want to manage infrastructure

Feature comparison

CapabilityGPT AudioSolar Pro 3
Open weights (downloadable)
Self-hostable
Runs fully offline
Vision / multimodal
Tool / function calling
1M+ context window

Benchmarks: GPT Audio vs Solar Pro 3

Independent benchmark scores measured by Artificial Analysis. Higher is better (except latency).

GPT Audio
Solar Pro 3
Intelligence index
7.8
Coding index
16.2
GPQA
72.4%
Humanity's Last Exam
10.3%
Long Context Reasoning
32.3%
SciCode
25.5%
IFBench
71.2%
τ²-Bench
86.3%
τ-Bench Banking
8.7%
Terminal-Bench
12%
Terminal-Bench Hard
7.6%
Speed
157.2 tok/s
Latency
1.33s
Intelligence per $
29.8

Benchmark data by Artificial Analysis.

How GPT Audio and Solar Pro 3 score

🏆 Best value & openness: Solar Pro 3 (2.9 vs 2.6 / 5)
CriterionGPT AudioSolar Pro 3
Cost-efficiency3.55.0
Context window3.53.5
Openness1.51.5
Self-hosting1.01.0
Multimodality3.53.5

Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.

What each model is

GPT Audio Paid

OpenAI · Proprietary

The gpt-audio model is OpenAI's first generally available audio model. The new snapshot features an upgraded decoder for more natural sounding voices and maintains better voice consistency. Audio is priced...

Solar Pro 3 Paid

Upstage · Proprietary

Solar Pro 3 is Upstage's powerful Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) language model. With 102B total parameters and 12B active parameters per forward pass, it delivers exceptional performance while maintaining computational efficiency. Optimized...

Frequently asked questions

GPT Audio vs Solar Pro 3 — which is cheaper?

Solar Pro 3 is cheaper on output ($0.6/M vs $10/M).

Which has the larger context window?

Solar Pro 3 offers the larger context window (131K tokens).

GPT Audio vs Solar Pro 3 — which should I pick in 2026?

Choose Solar Pro 3 for the lower output price ($0.6/M vs $10/M). It also gives you the larger 131K context window.

People also compare

Explore more open-source AI

Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.

Open the leaderboard →