GPT Audio vs Relace Search compared — price per token, context window, multimodality, openness and which to choose. Full 2026 breakdown.
GPT Audio — full profile › · Relace Search — full profile ›
Prices & specs refreshed from live data · olud.ai
Open-model prices = cheapest provider via OpenRouter; official maker rates may be higher.
| Spec | GPT Audio | Relace Search | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maker | OpenAI | Relace | – |
| Type | Proprietary | Proprietary | – |
| Context window | 128K tokens | 256K tokens | RERelace Search |
| Input price | $2.5/M | $1/M | RERelace Search |
| Output price | $10/M | $3/M | RERelace Search |
| Vision / multimodal | No | No | – |
| Tool / function calling | Yes | Yes | = Tie |
| Self-hostable | No (API only) | No (API only) | – |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary | – |
Relace Search is ~3.3× cheaper than GPT Audio on output tokens ($3 vs $10 per M tokens).
| Capability | GPT Audio | Relace Search |
|---|---|---|
| Open weights (downloadable) | ✗ | ✗ |
| Self-hostable | ✗ | ✗ |
| Runs fully offline | ✗ | ✗ |
| Vision / multimodal | ✗ | ✗ |
| Tool / function calling | ✓ | ✓ |
| 1M+ context window | ✗ | ✗ |
| Criterion | GPT Audio | Relace Search |
|---|---|---|
| Cost-efficiency | 3.5 | 4.0 |
| Context window | 3.5 | 4.0 |
| Openness | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Self-hosting | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Multimodality | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Scores come from live data — output price (cost), context length, open vs closed weights (openness & self-hosting) and vision/tool support (multimodality). Raw task quality isn't scored here; it depends on your benchmark — see the verdict.
The gpt-audio model is OpenAI's first generally available audio model. The new snapshot features an upgraded decoder for more natural sounding voices and maintains better voice consistency. Audio is priced...
The relace-search model uses 4-12 `view_file` and `grep` tools in parallel to explore a codebase and return relevant files to the user request. In contrast to RAG, relace-search performs agentic...
Relace Search is cheaper on output ($3/M vs $10/M).
Relace Search offers the larger context window (256K tokens).
Choose Relace Search for the lower output price ($3/M vs $10/M). It also gives you the larger 256K context window.
Browse the full open-source model leaderboard, thousands of tools and live benchmarks — all in one place.
Open the leaderboard →